Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Average Man With Full-Time Job in U.S. Earned Less in 2014 than 1973
Breitbart News Network ^ | 13 Jun 2016 | Caroline May

Posted on 06/13/2016 11:33:29 AM PDT by george76

The average man with a full-time job in 2014 earned less than the average man in 1973 ... shedding additional light on the perceived economic stagnation and frustration among middle-income Americans in recent years.

...

the median earnings of a man working full-time in 1973 was $53,294 — measured in 2014 dollars — while the median income for a man working full-time in 2014 was $50,383.

“This one fact, tucked in Table A-4 of the Census Bureau’s annual report on income, is both a symptom of an economy that isn’t delivering for many ordinary Americans and at least one reason for the dissatisfaction, anger, and distrust that voters are displaying in the 2016 presidential campaign,” David Wessel, director of the Brookings Institution’s Hutchins Center

(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; Business/Economy; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: economy; employment; jobs
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-47 next last
To: reed13k
the median earnings of a man working full-time in 1973 was $53,294 — measured in 2014 dollars — while the median income for a man working full-time in 2014 was $50,383.
21 posted on 06/13/2016 12:27:04 PM PDT by Toddsterpatriot ("Telling the government to lower trade barriers to zero...is government interference" central_va)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Toddsterpatriot

That is wage income. When one adds in interest into the equation, the drop is even more dynamic. That is why seniors are having such a difficult time of it. Anyone who saved money figuring they would live partly off interest has gotten destroyed.


22 posted on 06/13/2016 12:41:40 PM PDT by Mouton (The insurrection laws maintain the status quo now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: george76

The CHEAP LABOR EXPRESS keeps wages down and citizens in line... well, that’s Romney’s wet dream.


23 posted on 06/13/2016 12:44:57 PM PDT by GOPJ ("9-in-10 GOP outsiders say 4-in-10 GOP insiderds should STFU". - Freeper RoosterRedux)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GOPJ
The CHEAP LABOR EXPRESS keeps wages down and citizens in line

Both illegal immigration and overseas outsourcing always had one goal: break the Unions, and the pricing power of labor.

The fact that the U.S. turns into an ethnically balkanized police state to accomplish that means nothing to the Ruling Class. The important point is, their profits mount, and they won't be living where the grunts are anyway.

24 posted on 06/13/2016 12:53:37 PM PDT by Regulator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Neoliberalnot

You also used to get 5 percent on your savings. Yet another hit.


25 posted on 06/13/2016 12:59:13 PM PDT by crusher2013 (Liberalism is Aristocracy masquerading as equality)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: george76; All

Welfare began in 1964, then with the Coinage Act of 1965 spending ramped up and devaluation stepped in. By 1971 the Brits and Italians realized the “New System” for what it was and demanded their payment in Bullion. President Nixon promptly closed the Gold Window because we were BANKRUPT. NOTHING HAS CHANGED, the Money Changers have been Stealing 5% annually from EVERY DOLLAR IN EXISTENCE.


26 posted on 06/13/2016 1:03:02 PM PDT by eyeamok (destruction of government records.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FirstFlaBn

Yeah, that average vs. median thing trips up a lot of people. Sowell would have to write a column about it every year, but even he has given up, I think.


27 posted on 06/13/2016 1:10:11 PM PDT by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: george76

That’s what happens when you flood a labor market with fraudulently documented foreigners and don’t enforce the laws.

Exactly as planned.

Courtesy of The Cheap Labor Express


28 posted on 06/13/2016 1:13:41 PM PDT by Lurkinanloomin (Know Islam, No Peace - No Islam, Know Peace)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: george76

I’ve been pointing this out for DECADES, that it now takes 2 incomes to basically equate what 1 income made 40 years ago... and I get attacked every time I point that out here.

For 4 decades both parties have been selling this nation out.

1976 median household income adjusted for inflation vs 2016 is roughly the same adjusted for inflation, meanwhile the average household is now a two income household vs a single income household...

What is the excuses folks give when this is pointed out.. yea, but costs of things are cheaper so you are actually better off, now that your mom isn’t home with your kids because she has to work to pay bills, but its okay because you can buy a $6 toaster, you are better off.

Idiots.


29 posted on 06/13/2016 1:18:34 PM PDT by HamiltonJay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FirstFlaBn

Benefits are new since 1973?

Are we intentionally distorting reality to attempt to make a point?

Healthcare costs have been hidden in benefit packages to a certain extent, but there were a lot more defined pension plans in the 70’s that are long gone.

Personally, I have a lot of extended family members working blue collar jobs & I’ve watched them tread water and lose ground for the last +20 years.


30 posted on 06/13/2016 1:32:54 PM PDT by zek157
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: TangibleDisgust

It’s no coincidence that men’s wages stagnated as immigration surged beginning in the 1970s.


31 posted on 06/13/2016 1:34:38 PM PDT by WashingtonSource
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Mouton
That is wage income. When one adds in interest into the equation, the drop is even more dynamic.

Why would you add interest when discussing wage income?

32 posted on 06/13/2016 1:43:22 PM PDT by Toddsterpatriot ("Telling the government to lower trade barriers to zero...is government interference" central_va)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: bgill

Right there with ya. In fact, probably worse off.

It’s unbelievable these days.


33 posted on 06/13/2016 1:53:36 PM PDT by SaveFerris (Be a blessing to a stranger today for some have entertained angels unaware)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Toddsterpatriot

Thanks - missed it in the body.


34 posted on 06/13/2016 2:03:40 PM PDT by reed13k
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Toddsterpatriot

The overall issue is a decline of purchasing power and standard of living, got it?


35 posted on 06/13/2016 2:04:38 PM PDT by Mouton (The insurrection laws maintain the status quo now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: SaveFerris

Four generations have lived in this house but due to the economy, we’re being forced to move.


36 posted on 06/13/2016 2:07:20 PM PDT by bgill (CDC site, "We still do not know exactly how people are infected with Ebola")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: bgill

Oh believe me, I understand completely.


37 posted on 06/13/2016 2:13:35 PM PDT by SaveFerris (Be a blessing to a stranger today for some have entertained angels unaware)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Mouton
Lower interest rates allowed me to refinance my mortgage. Raised my standard of living.

I'm borrowing a lot more than I'm holding as checking or savings balances. The median worker potentially even more so than me.

38 posted on 06/13/2016 2:14:30 PM PDT by Toddsterpatriot ("Telling the government to lower trade barriers to zero...is government interference" central_va)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: zek157
Benefits are new since 1973?

Benefits are nontaxable. As health care costs rose, rational employers offered more non-taxable benefits in lieu of pay increases. Not even considering income taxes, a pay increase meant both you and your employer paid Medicare/SS taxes.

For some strange reason, I remember my employer in 1977 informing us that single health insurance was costing him $40 per month (he paid 100%). Tax the difference at almost 15%.

I offered the way to check the writer's dishonesty. You instead fell back on anecdote. Waste of time.

39 posted on 06/13/2016 3:56:44 PM PDT by FirstFlaBn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: george76

But why? Why has wealth income stagnated for the middle class?

The reason is stored inside the vast crevasses of my cranial capacity. Let me look. Oh, there it is. dot dot dot 1970ish dot dot dot. What significant event occurred in 1970ish?

The rich DID get richer since then. The middle class has been decimated since 1970ish.

USA went OFF the GOLD STANDARD completely about 1970ish. Charts exist that shows from 1970ish until now, the rich gap widened. Money charts do exist as proof. I have it buried somewhere. The GOLD STANDARD kept the middle class wealthy. Middle Americans should be demanding a GOLD STANDARD.


40 posted on 06/13/2016 4:18:41 PM PDT by TheNext (Hillary Hurts Little Children *sad sigh*)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-47 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson