[papertyger]

I simply asked you to explain why you're not killing fags, and instead holding back to a moral limit that denies you that act. After all, you're the one that mocked the very idea that homosexuals should be treated with any respect at all. So explain yourself, instead of playing word games about projection.

I've found it's not worth my time to acknowledge people whose posts are so laced with hyperbole, presumption, and disingenuousness that they find alternative views incomprehensible apart from their ingrained prejudices.

Suffice to say, you are obviously a western version of those muslim kids that can watch a beheading without qualm.

[Talisker]

I've found it's not worth my time to acknowledge people whose posts are so laced with hyperbole, presumption, and disingenuousness that they find alternative views incomprehensible apart from their ingrained prejudices.

Says the person who wrote: "Are you forgetting exactly what “gay,” is? For you to use the phrase “violation of human decency” in defense of sodomy is indicative of just how far we’ve fallen."

And then you 1) Won't exterminate the "sodomists" who you claim don't deserve human decency, but 2) Refuse to explain what moral line of decency does apply that keeps you from exterminating them, and 3) Call my observation of your rank hypocrisy and cowardice over not doing your duty to rid the world of, to you, literally inhuman scum, "hyperbole, presumption, and disingenuousness."

LOL, hypocrite.

Suffice to say, you are obviously a western version of those muslim kids that can watch a beheading without qualm.

Suffice to say, you are obviously a western version of those muslim Imams that can order a beheading without qualm - as long as you don't have to do it yourself.

Congratulations - you're what's wrong with the entire world.