Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

So, I guess you can openly carry a weapon... ???
1 posted on 06/09/2016 1:35:31 PM PDT by Innovative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Innovative
The en banc opinion by the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals

Another cogent reason to elect Trump! Judges!!!

2 posted on 06/09/2016 1:38:23 PM PDT by Don Corleone (.C.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Innovative

You can were I live.


3 posted on 06/09/2016 1:39:19 PM PDT by corlorde
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Innovative

It seems a rhetorical question but it’s actually the crux of the issue:

There is unquestionably a right to bear arms. To do so in public would mean open carry or concealed. There is no third option. Is the court saying that a Constituional right must only be exercised in one’s home? Does such a restriction apply to any other freedom?


4 posted on 06/09/2016 1:45:42 PM PDT by relictele (Principiis obsta & Finem respice - Resist The Beginnings & Consider The Ends.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Innovative

This is why it matters who wins the Presidency. If Hillary wins then she appoints a Supreme Court that will destroy this right and if we want it we’ll have to bleed for it.

It;s easier to vote for it...pay attention NeverTrump people!!!


5 posted on 06/09/2016 1:58:30 PM PDT by MeganC (The Republic of The United States of America: 7/4/1776 to 6/26/2015 R.I.P.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Innovative; All

Patriots, noting that the 10th Amendment also expressly protects the power of the people, tell your state lawmakers that you want concealed carry and vote them out of office or recall them if they don’t comply.


6 posted on 06/09/2016 2:07:14 PM PDT by Amendment10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Innovative

How do they know if it is concealled?


7 posted on 06/09/2016 2:08:19 PM PDT by Paladin2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Innovative
This is only a preview of coming attractions, I suspect. Now, I bet Bloomberg will fund hoplophobes in all 50 states who say they are in danger from unconstitutional concealed carry, in an attempt to get concealed carry and non-permitted carry completely shut down.

We all must decide what we will do on the day the government says you cannot carry your gun outside your home.

8 posted on 06/09/2016 2:11:38 PM PDT by backwoods-engineer (AMERICA IS DONE! When can we start over?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Innovative
That's my take on it...

Since SCOTUS has ruled that we do have an individual right to carry (just like the 2nd Amendment plainly states) the logical conclusion flowing from this ruling by the 9th Circus Court is that there can be no laws against open carry.

11 posted on 06/09/2016 2:33:29 PM PDT by TigersEye (This is the age of the death of reason and rule of law. Prepare!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Innovative
At issue was California's law on concealed weapons, which requires citizens to prove they have "good cause" to carry concealed firearms to get a license.

Good cause or not, any licensing requirement is an infringement upon our rights recognized in the second amendment, and invalid.

12 posted on 06/09/2016 2:40:18 PM PDT by JimRed (Is it 1776 yet? TERM LIMITS, now and forever! Build the Wall, NOW!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Innovative

Except open carry is also illegal in CA. So basically in CA the 2nd amendment is dead.


19 posted on 06/09/2016 2:58:06 PM PDT by Magnum44 (I dissent)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Innovative

Ever notice how SC rulings the left doesnt like (eg. Heller) are quickly set up to be overturned, but rulings conservatives dont like (eg. Rowe v wade) are never challenged? Their rulings are “settled law” and permanent, ours are temporary setbacks.


20 posted on 06/09/2016 3:00:43 PM PDT by Brooklyn Attitude (The first step in ending the War on White People, is to recognize it exists.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Innovative
simply looking for their 15minutes
23 posted on 06/09/2016 3:52:51 PM PDT by Chode (Stand UP and Be Counted, or line up and be numbered - *DTOM* -w- NO Pity for the LAZY - Luke, 22:36)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Innovative

Dred Scott vs Sanford.
What the SCOTUS thought about gun control in the pre Civil War era.

http://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/historics/USSC_CR_0060_0393_ZO.html

“It would give to persons of the negro race, who were recognised as citizens in any one State of the Union, the right to enter every other State whenever they pleased,

singly or in companies, without pass or passport, and without obstruction, to sojourn there as long as they pleased, to go where they pleased at every hour of the day or night without molestation, unless they committed some violation of law for which a white man would be punished;
and it would give them the full liberty of speech in public and in private upon all subjects upon which its own citizens might speak; to hold public meetings upon political affairs,

and to KEEP AND CARRY ARMS wherever they went.”

So ruled John Taney. No mention of concealed weapons.


24 posted on 06/09/2016 4:18:37 PM PDT by Ruy Dias de Bivar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Innovative

keep and bear....nothing re: (non)concealed. Choice of the owner on HOW to utilize their Right(s). Let alone one that shall not be infringed.


25 posted on 06/09/2016 6:27:03 PM PDT by i_robot73 ("A man chooses. A slave obeys." - Andrew Ryan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson