Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ransomnote

There’s no report of a giant fish kill in Vermont. Undoubtedly the radiation from Fukushima spread far and wide. But radiation is detectable at very low levels. I was just saying that the claim that radioactivity floated around in the ocean (being diluted) for 5 years and suddenly came ashore at such a strength to kill lots of fish, when no such thing had happened much closer in time and distance, doesn’t make any sense.


40 posted on 06/05/2016 7:41:26 PM PDT by wideminded
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]


To: wideminded

No fish kill in Vermont, eh? So the presence of radiation 6+ K from origin doesn’t make it seem slightly possible that it could be present 2K from origin.
And here you introduce the strawman argument that radiation “came ashore” to kill lots of fish? That’s all yours - no one else said it. You do know fish swim right? And some traverse great distances etc.? And toxins build up in the food chain over time. Grazing aquatic creatures would continue to concentrate toxins found in their fodder? etc., etc., etc.


42 posted on 06/06/2016 1:58:39 PM PDT by ransomnote
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson