Posted on 06/05/2016 4:48:39 AM PDT by 5150 FREEPER
Colby Coash can point to the moment his evolution in thinking about the death penalty began.
It was Sept. 3, 1994, and Coash — now a conservative senator in the Nebraska legislature but then a freshman at the University of Nebraska-Lincoln — decided to go with some friends to the state penitentiary. Willie Otey, convicted of first-degree murder, was set to be executed at midnight, and people were gathering in the parking lot outside. Coash can still remember the scene: the live band, the grilling meat, the revelers popping cans of beer and chanting, “Fry him!”
“You wouldn’t have been able to tell the difference between the parking lot of the penitentiary and a tailgate. It was pretty ugly,” Coash says now. Even though he went to the event as a supporter of capital punishment, he says, “it kind of changed my heart. I thought, ‘I don’t want to be a part of state-sponsored killing.’ ”
(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...
I'm with you on this.
Scouts Out! Cavalry Ho!
Murderers often escape from prison, but I have yet to hear of one escaping from the grave.
Death penalties, even if rarely enforced, are a useful tool for plea-bargaining - especially if the murderer points out the graves location so the family can have closure of a sort.
IMO, there can never be closure, only vengeance when the murderer is executed. (A pity the founding fathers remove the “cruel and unusual” bit.)
A further IMO is that if there is conclusive DNA and or trace evidence against the murderer, there is no probation at all and preferably, the appeals procedure is considerably shortened. We have people on death row who have lived there longer than the life of their victims.
I’ll agree to ban the death penalty if abortion is banned at the same time and the two tied together.
“Life in prison” is a coward’s death penalty.
I have a profoundly strong counter argument.
The flip side of the government inability to execute even the most hateful serial killers, is gun liberty.
The vast, unreasonably complex and convoluted pipes that have been created solely to inhibit the death penalty, have indeed “clogged the toilet.” Slapping so many limits on the process that *nobody* can be expeditiously terminated.
However, gun liberty changes that dramatically. If an armed robber is ingloriously gunned down by an armed citizen, he has no lawyer, judge, jury, ACLU, or other appeal to evade justice.
He did not have to be a serial killer. An ordinary killer, or even attempted killer, a terrorist, a robber or burglar, a rapist or molester, or even an angry drunk who wants to beat someone else, might get his trial and execution in the same *moment*.
And the public will not give a damn. Good riddance to bad rubbish. It will not matter if he is retarded, was abused as a child, etc., ad nauseum.
Bullets do not care. They are “The People’s” capital punishment.
Uh, conservatives...it’s Biblically mandated.
I am a Catholic as well and cannot abide by capital punishment. I understand everyone’s point, but can’t reconcile it personally.
I do not want to pay to keep the worst killers alive.
Almost every single person on death row (in the states that have the death penalty) are guilty. The solution is not to keep people who deserve execution alive, the solution is a better justice system to factually determine who is innocent and who is guilty.
Not only that, executions need to be sped way, way up.
Umm, no, its not the same thing, sorry. Still against it, and still a conservative.
Not much of a rebuttal. But you’re free to believe what you want.
In general, they were known scumbags with previous convictions. Often, they are very guilty and were involved in the murder, but didn't "pull the trigger."
The lack of any real evidence that we are putting any innocent people to death means the whole anti-capital punishment movement is a sham.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.