Posted on 06/03/2016 5:47:25 AM PDT by MarvinStinson
A report today by the Department of Homeland Security Inspector General concludes that the field office director at the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services “improperly delayed” investigators from Immigration and Customs Enforcement from conducting a “lawful and routine law enforcement action” after the San Bernardino terrrorist attack last December.
The report will be posted soon on the Inspector General’s website.
Inspector General John Roth conducted the investigation at the request of Sen. Ron Johnson, Chairman of the Committee on Homeland Security and Government Affairs.
Roth notes that the “situation” was “corrected” once the incident was “elevated” to supervisors. But the report provides new evidence that despite extensive money and effort spent to help federal agencies better coordinate and cooperate, especially when it comes to terrorist-related risks, inter-agency bungling continues.
On December 2, 2015, two Islamic extremist terrorists, Syed Farook and Tashfeen Malik, opened fire at a holiday party where Farook worked. They killed 14 people and injured 22 more before fleeing. The couple was later killed in a shootout with police.
According to the Inspector General, less than 24 hours after the attack, the Homeland Security Investigations division of Immigration and Customs Enforcement was notified that a couple associated with the suspects would be appearing for an immigration appointment at the Citizenship and Immigration Services office in San Bernardino. Homeland Security Investigations dispatched a team to go to the Citizenship office “to prevent any possible further attacks” and detain the couple: Mariya Chernykh and Enrique Marquez. Marquez has been identified as the man who purchased two rifles used in the attack.
“The day after a terrorism attack when all those people died, you have a bureaucracy of one federal agency not allowing another to do its job. It’s ridiculous on the face of it,” says one official associated with the investigation.
When the four agents arrived at the federal building in tactical gear, they informed building security they were there on an “urgent matter” to find somebody who may have been connected to the shootings. However, they were told they would have to wait for permission to enter the building from the field office director of Citizenship and Immigration Services.
Instead of admitting the agents, the I.G. report states, the field office director contacted her superior. A chain of notifications and permissions took place while the agents were confined to the lobby for 15 to 20 minutes. Next, they were escorted to a conference room where they met with the field office director and waited another 10 minutes.
Incredibly, the field office director told the agents they were “not allowed to arrest, detain or interview anyone in the building based on [U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services] policy, and that she would need to obtain guidance from her superior before allowing them access.” The agents further spoke via telephone with an Acting Chief for Citizenship and Immigration Services who repeated that they were not allowed to arrest, detain or interview on the property.
According to the I.G., the field office director denies telling the agents they could not arrest, detain or interview on the premises. But the report notes her account was contradicted by other Homeland Security Investigations agents who were there. Building security officials also disputed parts of the field office director’s account.
The alleged obstruction continued, according to Homeland Security Investigations agents, when they requested information from the federal files of Citizenship and Immigration Services. The field office director allegedly refused to provide it. Believing that the field office director was not going to cooperate in their effort to locate a potential suspect, the agents left the building.
Ultimately, the associate director of U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services determined it was permissible for the agents to access the file and that they should be provided whatever they wanted. By then, more than an hour had passed.
The I.G. concluded that “contrary to the Field Office Director’s assertion, there is no [U.S. Customs and Immigration Services] policy written procedure, or documented standard operating procedures pertaining to arrests, detentions or interviews” by Homeland Security officials in immigration facilities. The I.G. also found that the agents “should have been granted access to the immigration file in question.” Stated simply, the I.G. said, “the Field Office Director was not candid with [Office of Inspector General] investigators during her interview.”
Marquez and Malik never showed up for their immigration appointment that day. Marquez was subsequently captured and charged with providing material support to terrorists, straw purchasing of a firearm, and marriage fraud.
In recent years, some border patrol agents and immigration agents have accused superiors of systematically throwing up barriers and roadblocks in their attempt to enforce U.S. immigration law.
The I.G. says Immigration and Customs is developing a new, joint policy to allow federal Homeland Security investigators more expedient access during an emergency situation. There is no mention in the report of any disciplinary considerations regarding the field office director who allegedly misstated policy and delayed the agents during their terrorist investigation.
Easy day, mate.
No worries.
So I am sure there has been accountability for this and a number of bureaucrats have been fired. </sarcasm>
And yet the Feds have their panties in a wad not only over encrypted devices owned by millions of law abiding citizens, but also how much salt is in our foods or mandating men who have been denied the newly invented “right” to use a woman's bathroom, just to name a few.
Meant to delete the word “mandating” above.
Good contrast.
How about this as a question to ask this glorious and transparent Administration as it winds down. In every non-government business, there are people who are discharged (fired) for various reasons. It is a NATURAL and EXPECTED process, of note only for those times when it violates some governmental regulation.
So, Mr President, how many people, in this largest of employers, have you discharged? To be fair, give us the numbers with and without military non-honorable discharges. Then use the Civil Service records to compare with previous administrations.
Should be interesting!
WHO IS THE Acting Chief for Citizenship and Immigration Services AND WHAT WILL IT TAKE TO PUT EX- IN FRONT OF THAT TITLE?
The first action by the Trump Administration will be the firing of thousands of worthless bureaucrats.
Terrorists are in the Government, of course they will do their best to bring the country down.
The first action by the Trump Administration will be the firing of thousands of worthless bureaucrats.
*************
Start with Energy and Education in full and then hold a lottery with 100 bingo balls numbered 00 through 99 ... pull 20 balls ,, if your ssn’s last 2 digits were pulled you’re fired.
Because some government traitor had them in a secure location and placed Marquez in a supposed mental facility (aka safe house) to buy time for them to create his story.
bump
No more protecting the terrorists if Trump gets in. Obama is a traitor and disgrace.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.