Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Lorianne
It was on property guarded by the Secret Service. And there were no security breaches.

She's so out of touch she thinks the sever would have to physically breached to get information from it.

2 posted on 05/30/2016 6:56:55 AM PDT by libertylover (The problem with Obama is not that his skin is too black, it's that his ideas are too RED.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: libertylover

Hillary’s lying.

Just like that crap she did when asked if her server had been wiped clean.... and she smirks and says “like this?” and makes a motion like she has a cloth wiping a window.

Only the American press is vile or stupid enough to buy her lies... democrats know she’s lying and pretend otherwise to fool the ‘rubes’ in flyover.


4 posted on 05/30/2016 7:02:32 AM PDT by GOPJ (Clinton was impeached for LYING UNDER OATH in a SEXUAL HARASSMENT case NOT for an affair.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: libertylover

Out of touch? No. Even she isn’t that dumb.

It depends on which lie she is telling at which time. That ‘secure’ server has been said to be located at the NY residence, in a closet in an apartment in Colorado, in Manhattan, in New Jersey.

She tries to play dumb — recall the ‘Wipe? You mean like with a cloth?’ remark she made when questioned about the server being wiped.

Recall her excuse that she didn’t want a private and a State Department email account because she ‘didn’t want to have to carry two smartphones around.’

Last week, it was revealed in a quote attributed to her tha she was more concerned about an outsider getting access to her private emails than she was about State Department classified emails. That should raise eyebrows. What was in those private emails that had her so concerned? The recipe to Chelsea’s wedding cake? Yeah, right.

She lies, she obfuscates, she makes up all kinds of excuses. She thinks she is clever. BJ did it — and mostly, he got away with it. She expects to, as well.


13 posted on 05/30/2016 7:34:17 AM PDT by TomGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: libertylover
It was on property guarded by the Secret Service. And there were no security breaches.

She's so out of touch she thinks the sever would have to physically breached to get information from it.

Funny considering the guy managing it didn't have a security clearance.....zero clearance and access to Top Secret/SCI data - no security breach here folks....

If a machine touches a classified network, even without transferring any data, it become classified to the level of the highest classification on the network it touched.....

16 posted on 05/30/2016 8:08:35 AM PDT by trebb (Where in the the hell has my country gone?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: libertylover

It was on property guarded by the Secret Service. And there were no security breaches.


Simply lawyer speak. She could factually respond to those questioning the comment that the Secret Service protected the grounds and no “one” had gotten through them physically.

She knew she was dodging the question but the press never calls her on her “lies” by asking the follow up question nor pointing out the limitations of her answer.


18 posted on 05/30/2016 8:10:45 AM PDT by georgiarat (Obama, providing incompetence since Day One!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson