Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: kabar

Despite the old communist associations with “Workers Party”, Donald clearly gives it new meaning, i.e.....The party of those who honestly work for a living vs. those who could work but expect the govt. to care for them via welfare programs, food stamps, disability, etc.


108 posted on 05/29/2016 7:44:34 AM PDT by chiller (One from the Right - One for the Fight)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies ]


To: chiller
-- Despite the old communist associations with "Workers Party", Donald clearly gives it new meaning, i.e.....The party of those who honestly work for a living vs. those who could work but expect the govt. to care for them via welfare programs, food stamps, disability, etc. --

The press is trying to peel off "small government" voters who favor Trump with this "workers party = communist" association. I think it came up in one of the talk shows this morning, and the answer given was that Trump's refefrence is to "American workers," which leads the same way you say. Jobs for Americans, not jobs for trading treaty partners.

120 posted on 05/29/2016 8:01:33 AM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies ]

To: chiller
British jobs for British workers galvanized a consensus in the UK over the immigration issue. The slogan started in the BNP, but it gained such resonance that all the parties across the spectrum adopted that position.

Both US parties have abandoned the American worker. It is time that someone put our workers and our people first. Trump is doing it and you see the results. It is a winning strategy.

124 posted on 05/29/2016 8:06:05 AM PDT by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson