Dixie Chicks re-enact Vince Forster's last hour (Goodby Earl song)
Posted on 05/29/2016 4:30:08 AM PDT by Alas Babylon!
The Talk Shows
May 29th, 2016
Guests to be interviewed today on major television talk shows:
FOX NEWS SUNDAY (Fox Network): Corey Lewandowski, Trump's campaign manager; Sen. James Lankford, R-Okla.; Rep. Adam Schiff, D-Calif.
MEET THE PRESS (NBC): Democratic presidential candidate Bernie Sanders; former Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger, R-Calif.
FACE THE NATION (CBS): Sanders; Sen. Ron Johnson R-Wis.; Gov. John Hickenlooper, D-Colo.
THIS WEEK (ABC): Paul Manafort, adviser to Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump; Sens. John Barrasso, R-Wyo., and Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif.
STATE OF THE UNION (CNN): Sen. Marco Rubio, R-Fla.
Corey Lewandowski just manhandled Chris “super subjective” Wallace.
Holding on to hear from George Will for the comedy factor.
Romney and Ryan are joined at the hip. They despise Trump and would rather lose than see Trump in the WH. And the Bushes are no better. Trump had to sign a loyalty oath and these bastards balk at supporting the nominee of the party who has won a record number of primary votes and the total GOP participation in the primaries has also set a record. The arrogance and hubris of these RINOs are disgusting.
Well, it's all speculation anyway. I don't follow Martinez at all. Does she make a habit of identifying as a Latino? Maybe she's a closet racist, and Trump senses that. "As the first Hispanic female governor in history ..."
Brit Hume and George Will should search out the other 400 Conservative (so-called) Elites living in the wealthiest ZIP codes around DC and form their own party. Maybe call it the "Snob Whiner's Party" - - 'cause I sure as hell don't want them in my party - the GOP.
I figured she must have...but did not see it.
How did she hit him? By refusing to attend his rally?
They count on the viewers to have a short memory.
She was on the NeverTrump bandwagon and has tried to take him down along with the other so called conservatives. Trump does not bend to brazen disloyalty.
Trump missed a slam-dunk checkmate by failing to mention Pocahontas made her fortune flipping houses. Buying low in a down market and selling high.
Maybe it’s not too late, but I doubt Pocahontas will try that line of attack again. Nor Hillary, lest the specifics of Whitewater are thrown in her face.
But they’re still hoping, as are all the Salem Radio GOPe goons.
I’m sure there will be a handful of jackasses that purport to be delegates of conscience that will withhold their vote for Trump on the floor.
So, so glad that Trump will be 200+ over and above 1237. Otherwise, Cruz would have most certainly attempted to assume his “ordained” place as the nominee. He may well have succeeded had the count been close.
Will be interesting to see if Cruz decides to ultimately place nice. Otherwise, the Trump forces will surely deny him a speaking slot at the convention. Ideally, Cruz just watches the convention on TV with the Bush clan.
Peter Schweizer on now with Maria B
Right now, the party is in a state of transition. Historically, it has been the home of the snob whiners. They've used their positions of influence and aristocracy to run the country down.
Maybe, someday, the party will be home to the people who put America first.
Dixie Chicks re-enact Vince Forster's last hour (Goodby Earl song)
Gret stuff bud.
I hate to get conspiratorial again...but could all this be the doing of the NWO/kabal. Sure seems like it to me.
They should read Jeff Sessions' brilliant piece written over 2 years ago, Becoming the party of work--How the GOP can help struggling Americans, and itself. It is the template for victory and only Trump appears to have read it. An excerpt:
According to a new Washington Post/ABC News poll, seven in ten voters believe that the Republican party is “out of touch with the concerns of most people in the United States today.” What follows is a plan for how the GOP can win back their trust — and a build a conservative majority in the process. But first, a little history.
When Americans went to the polls in 2012, the following was true: Work-force participation had sunk to its lowest level in 35 years, wages had fallen below 1999 levels, and 47 million Americans were on food stamps. Yet Mitt Romney, the challenger to the incumbent president, lost lower- and middle-income voters by an astonishing margin. Among voters earning $30,000 to $50,000, he trailed by 15 points, and among voters earning under $30,000 he trailed by 28 points.
And what did the GOP’s brilliant consultant class conclude from this resounding defeat? They declared that the GOP must embrace amnesty. The Republican National Committee dutifully issued a report calling for a “comprehensive immigration reform” that would inevitably increase the flow of low-skilled immigration, reducing the wages and living standards of the very voters whose trust the GOP had lost.
Over the past four decades, as factories were shuttered and blue-collar jobs were outsourced or automated, net immigration quadrupled. Yet the corporate-consultant class has pronounced that an insufficient level of immigration is the problem. A more colossal misreading of the political moment has rarely occurred.
Perhaps the most important political development now unfolding in the U.S. is the public’s growing loss of faith in our political and financial elites of both parties. To open the ears of disaffected voters, the GOP must break publicly from the elite immigration consensus of Wall Street and Davos. Republicans have a clear path to building a conservative majority if they free themselves from the corporate consultants and demonstrate to the American public that the GOP is the only party aligned with the core interests, concerns, and beliefs of everyday hardworking citizens.
But the immigration “principles” offered by House GOP leaders imply that record immigration levels must be increased further to meet “the needs of employers.” One such GOP proposal — to provide the food industry with half a million low-skilled workers each year — was polled by Rasmussen. Nearly 70 percent of independent voters opposed it.
“Most business leaders have long favored more open immigration. Different businesses want different kinds of people,” a prominent GOP fundraiser declared on TV. “A restaurant may want waiters and cooks; a hospital wants nurses and doctors; a university wants physicists; a business like Exelon needs more engineers.” Asked by the interviewer about hiring U.S. workers for open jobs, he replied that many of those now unemployed are “unable to compete for them.”
Is that the message of a winning party? It might win a majority of votes at a dinner party in a gated community in Bel Air, but it is an act of profound delusion to think that plan can form the basis of a nationwide Republican resurgence.
Democrats in Washington have already cast their lot. A recent report from the Center for Immigration Studies shows that all net employment gains from 2000 to 2013 — a period of record legal immigration — went to immigrant workers, and yet the immigration plan championed by the White House and congressional Democrats would triple the number of immigrants given permanent legal status over the next decade, and it would double the annual flow of guest workers to compete for jobs in every sector of the U.S. economy. The Democrats’ plan delivers for international corporations, open-borders groups, and even workers now living in other countries — all at the expense of American workers.
So Republicans have a choice. They can either join the Democrats as the second political party in Washington advocating uncontrolled immigration, or they can offer the public a principled alternative and represent the American workers Democrats have jettisoned. Republicans can either help the White House enact an immigration plan that will hollow out the American middle class, or they can finally expose the truth about the White House plan and detail the enormous harm it will inflict.
FoxNews did a couple segments with competing Congressmen on the issue. Wallace was snippy with the Hillary defender, who was lying his ass off.
YEah its hard to imagine there are still a few glen beck clones teetering on the same ledge he’s been on for a while....
Manafort is the more polished, conventional political consultant. I am concerned that he will try to put Trump into a political straitjacket that will take away many of his strengths. Trump should not modify his positions on immigration, trade, and the Islamic threat. If he does, Trump will lose.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.