Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Steve_Seattle

The Kalergi plan is being implemented in our time. European government propaganda through education laid the groundwork for invasion to become acceptable. We are all in the same boat. They now relocate people here due to political unrest, wars, famine, earthquakes, tsunamis,... you name it.

My only disagreement with Carol’s assessment is in regard to Kennedy. In other speeches in 1963, JFK was completely onboard with the EU idea and NWO concepts. There was a handbill disseminated in Dallas, as he rode through Dealey Plaza stating he was a traitor to the Constitution and guilty of treason for his proclamations of unity government to the UN. IMO, there was a patriotic segment within the CIA that was diametrically opposed to JFK’s beliefs and were highly motivated to maintain US sovereignty and autonomy.


14 posted on 05/28/2016 9:01:10 AM PDT by Beautiful_Gracious_Skies
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: Beautiful_Gracious_Skies
See too, James Burnham's Suicide of the West. He describes liberalism as a philosophy, which coincidentally, aligns with the means to perpetrate a downfall of Western Civilization.

Our institutions of media and government are totally on board with this, I'd estimate education to be about 80% taken over by liberals (there are some hard sciences and a few holdout teachers and professors even in liberal arts, law, etc. who reject PC), churches are onboard with liberal philosophy.

My seat of the pants tells me that radical transformation of the world system of government can be done in 5 generations, about 100 years, once the public has been softened.

People today have close to zero appreciation for history, and are, of course, attracted by the siren song of easy money and no cares. I am not optimistic for the long run.

17 posted on 05/28/2016 9:16:14 AM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

To: Beautiful_Gracious_Skies

I remember quite clearly that shortly after Bush II was elected, there was a full-page story on page A3 (news analysis) in the Seattle Times which openly talked about the contempt that European elites held for Bush’s defense of “American sovereignty,” and his willingness to put America’s interests ahead of any need for international consensus. For them - and I repeat, they said this openly - the idea of national sovereignty was outmoded, and anyone who took it seriously was no more than a hick or a fossil from the past.


43 posted on 05/28/2016 10:57:53 AM PDT by Steve_Seattle ("Above all, shake your bum at Burton.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson