Skip to comments.
Feds fight to prevent Clinton deposition in email case
The Hill ^
| 05/27/16
| Julian Hattem
Posted on 05/27/2016 10:16:44 PM PDT by detective
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-34 next last
The corrupt Obama administration is attempting to defy the order of a federal judge in order to save Hillary Clinton from having to testify under oath.
Obama is dirty and corrupt. Clinton knows it. The corrupt Obama administration does not want Clinton telling the truth under any circumstances.
The only thing saving Clinton from prison is the corrupt and treasonous Obama administration.
1
posted on
05/27/2016 10:16:44 PM PDT
by
detective
To: detective
Isn't this literally obstruction of justice?
2
posted on
05/27/2016 10:19:40 PM PDT
by
BenLurkin
(The above is not a statement of fact. It is either satire or opinion. Or both.)
To: detective
0bama is attempting to save his own sorry a$$. Some of those emails were to and from him.
3
posted on
05/27/2016 10:19:46 PM PDT
by
combat_boots
(The Lion of Judah cometh. Hallelujah. Gloria Patri, Filio et Spiritui Sancto!)
To: detective
Late Thursday evening, the Justice Department filed a court motion opposing the Clinton deposition request from conservative legal watchdog Judicial Watch... Late Thursday evening, LAWLESS THUGS from the Justice Department filed a court motion opposing the Clinton deposition request from conservative legal watchdog Judicial Watch...
I would recommend that American citizens attacked by this lawless federal governemnt take appropriate action.
They appear to understand only one language.
4
posted on
05/27/2016 10:22:55 PM PDT
by
kiryandil
(To the GOPee: "Giving the Democrats the Supreme Court means you ARE the Democrats.")
To: BenLurkin
Isn't this literally obstruction of justice? What's it to you, you mouthy peasant?
They got machine guns, so shut up.
5
posted on
05/27/2016 10:24:32 PM PDT
by
kiryandil
(To the GOPee: "Giving the Democrats the Supreme Court means you ARE the Democrats.")
To: detective
Why and how is DOJ involved? I realize it is a FOIA-related case, but why should the taxpayer fund her defense?
6
posted on
05/27/2016 10:46:32 PM PDT
by
kabar
To: detective
The more I read, the more I realize that all of the major players at the FBI, SS, DOJ, DOD and so forth need to be sh!tcanned as soon as Trump becomes President.
These criminals are violating every law under the sun, and they respect no one and nothing except whatever they want to respect.
7
posted on
05/27/2016 10:57:11 PM PDT
by
Prole
To: kabar
Why and how is DOJ involved? I realize it is a FOIA-related case, but why should the taxpayer fund her defense?Because she is Madame Benghazi, the Cold and Joyless, Queen of all she surveys. Or, so she thinks...
the infowarrior
To: detective
Obama’s most transparent administration continues to cover up its lies.
To: detective
Ah, the White House is obstructing an FBI investigation.
To: detective
Why do the media keep calling that a private server? It’s a world wide web (WWW.) server open to the public.
11
posted on
05/27/2016 11:58:15 PM PDT
by
BerryDingle
(I know how to deal with communists, I still wear their scars on my back from Hollywood-Ronald Reagan)
To: combat_boots
0bama is attempting to save his own sorry a$$. Some of those emails were to and from him. Exactly!
12
posted on
05/27/2016 11:59:31 PM PDT
by
BerryDingle
(I know how to deal with communists, I still wear their scars on my back from Hollywood-Ronald Reagan)
To: combat_boots
Not one person in the white house or the state department or congress has been asked “Did you think it was normal for Clinton’s email address to be HRC@clinton.com instead of HRC@state.gov?”
13
posted on
05/28/2016 12:34:42 AM PDT
by
VerySadAmerican
(The day Trump is sworn in I'm changing my screen name.)
To: detective
The govt and the press are nothing but RODEO CLOWNS for the Democrats.
14
posted on
05/28/2016 1:06:20 AM PDT
by
Ann Archy
(ABORTION....... The HUMAN Sacrifice to the god of Convenience.)
To: combat_boots
More than likely, yes. Should the truth come out on Benghazi, it won’t be pretty.
15
posted on
05/28/2016 1:22:01 AM PDT
by
SaveFerris
(Be a blessing to a stranger today for some have entertained angels unaware)
To: detective
Sad part is they will get away with it !
16
posted on
05/28/2016 1:47:57 AM PDT
by
ATOMIC_PUNK
(I think therefore im Dangerous to the liberal agenda !)
Obama's moving to protect Hillary isn't altruism....isn't the Democrat on
Democrat buddy system.....isn't a nice guy trying to protect his SoS.
As combat boots insightfully posted: Obama is attempting to save his
own sorry a$$. Some of those emails were to and from him.
FOREGONE CONCLUSIONS Impossible to believe Obama knew nothing about (1) the Clintons jerking around foreign policy, (2) selling access, (3)enriching the Clnton Foundation, (4) Hillary's running the State Dept as a cash cow for family and friends.
And....by the way.....none of the Clintons foreign policy machinations
interfered w/ Obama's (ahem) "foreign policy" initiatives (cue laugh machine).
Obama aided an abetted Hillary's direct action AND inaction that imperiled
US ntl security.....and endangered the safety and security of Americans.
17
posted on
05/28/2016 2:27:58 AM PDT
by
Liz
(SAFE PLAC? A liberal's mind. Nothing's there. Nothing can penetrate it.)
To: detective
We need a federal probe from a new tax payer funded commission blessed by trump that will route out arrest and prosecute everyone involved with attempted destruction of this country
To: detective
One thing you can say about the RATs, their party always comes first. Before God, before the nation, before the people (especially the little ones), before the law (especially the Constitution), kind of like their BFFs the soviets, norks and chicoms.
19
posted on
05/28/2016 4:00:40 AM PDT
by
fella
("As it was before Noah so shall it be again,")
To: kabar
...but why should the taxpayer fund her defense? because, if you remember correctly, her and Bill are broke.
20
posted on
05/28/2016 4:10:28 AM PDT
by
Cyclone59
(Where are we going, and what's with the handbasket?)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-34 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson