As someone pointed out here upthread, the few cases in which you place so much stock were brought in courts that hear divorces, dog-bite cases and boundary line disputes, and they were dismissed on procedural grounds because the pro se plaintiff didn’t really know what s/he was doing.
I’m going to guess that you were arguing against Obama’s eligibility 8 years ago, like the rest of us.
But Zero at least claims to have be born in the US. It’s called `special pleading’ when you change the goalposts because your team has the ball.
Eduardo doesn’t have the ball anymore, so as a practical political matter, the matter is moot.
And the only ones in the country who don’t seem be aware of this development are Ted Cruz and a few of his fanatical supporters here on FR.
If you need to stroke your ego and prove otherwise why don’t you pony up the money and take him to court.
The court rulings stand until overturned by a higher court.