You seem to have stepped out or evaded some questions. Lets try it again.
Have there not already been shenanigans involving these folks in the Republican party throughout the primaries?
Are you warning everyone the corrupt in the party still hold the power even through they don't hold the winning hand? No one buys that.
The above comment about more "Schannicagans" as you call them sound like a threat Tex, like they have some kind of ace in the hole or bargaining chip here. They lost Tex. They are the losers and Trump is the new boss.
You suggest there could be shenanigans at the convention but then turn around and say, "But there won't be"? You mean that's not really a threat towards Trump but it could be? Sounds like wishful thinking Tex.
Is this what your secretly hoping for? Do you not think America has had enough of of these corrupt delegate/caucus corruption and wide spread collusion in this election?
Btw, how do you define shenanigans? Would that be attempting to swindle a historic national election and go against the will of the people?
I’m not evading anything. I have a job. Work got in the way of my freeping. So, pardon me, Darlin’.
“Shennanigans” is a me thing like “prefect” is an onyx thing. (Courtesy ping b/c I mentioned her.)
I’ve said numerous times on this thread that there won’t be any shenanigans (feel better with it spelled your way?) So, no, it’s not a threat. It’s not a warning. It’s a statement of my opinion.
Trump has far more delegates than anyone else. He will be the nominee. Period. (I’ve also said that multiple times.)
You’re just itchin’ for a fight, but you ain’t gonna get one. There won’t be any shennanigans. The election won’t be stolen. Trump will be the nominee.
So stop poking me in the chest already.