“The report concludes it was “more probable than not””
More probable than not means nothing. It is just innuendo. They don’t have any evidence. It is just speculation.
I get it. You are still upset about the Snow Plow Incident.
There is no sense continuing.
I'm upset about the entire pantheon of Patriots cheating, including deflate-gate. But I don't base my opinion on this incident, on the "Snow Plow Incident".
"More probable than not" doesn't mean nothing. It's not just innuendo. It's very similar to the same standard of evidence used in civil suits every day; suits which defendants lose.
The standard of proof certainly sufficient to warrant disciplinary action against an employee of the friggin' NFL!
Thus, as the appellate court confirmed, the commissioner was entirely within his rights, and Tom Brady should serve his suspension.
Your stance appears to be consistent with the type of extreme pro-union bias one would expect expected in the Northeast...
I’m sorry man, I’ll stop now...