Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

While anyone who thinks about the subject quickly realizes that gun registration is all about empowering the state to confiscate guns, there are large numbers of people who do not think about it.

For them, the Washington Post statements can be revealing and instructive, especially because the Washington Post is accepted by most "progressives" as a serious source.

1 posted on 05/24/2016 4:30:47 AM PDT by marktwain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: marktwain

The caption did not come through with the picture. It is of Second Amendment supporters burning gun registration forms in New York.


2 posted on 05/24/2016 4:32:01 AM PDT by marktwain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: marktwain

A large segment of the US population thinks that confiscation is a good idea. They will work tirelessly to get there, step by step.

The only rational response to this is to oppose them at every step and at every opportunity. No matter how minor or “reasonable” the proposal, it should always be opposed because it is, inevitably, just another step along the predetermined path.


3 posted on 05/24/2016 4:43:11 AM PDT by Haiku Guy (New York Senator Kristin Gillibrand will be the next President of the United States)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: marktwain

If registration ever becomes required I will go to the police station that very day and report all of my guns lost in “an unfortunate boating accident”.

Problem solved.


4 posted on 05/24/2016 4:49:20 AM PDT by Snowybear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: marktwain

NY SAFE Act - massive noncompliance:

http://www.timesunion.com/tuplus-opinion/article/State-s-SAFE-Act-needs-to-set-its-sights-on-6754126.php

The SAFE Act also required that the estimated 1 million assault weapons in private ownership in 2013 be registered with the State Police. After the Cuomo administration stonewalled a Freedom of Information request for more than a year, an Albany judge ordered the State Police to release data on the number of weapons registered as required. They revealed that only 44,000 firearms had been registered.

Subtract from that number the firearms owned by police officers and licensed dealers (who have little way to avoid registration), and it’s clear the compliance rate for registration among average citizens is less than 4 percent. It’s hard to call a law that commands a 96 percent noncompliance rate a success

Due to its time-wasting bureaucracy, three-quarters of the state’s county sheriffs (including those elected in virtually all of the rural counties) have made clear they are not aggressively enforcing the SAFE Act, except as an “add-on” charge for other crimes, and 52 of the state’s 62 county legislatures have approved resolutions opposing the SAFE Act.


5 posted on 05/24/2016 4:53:08 AM PDT by Qiviut (In Islam you have to die for Allah. The God I worship died for me. [Franklin Graham])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: marktwain

LE can no longer be trusted to comply with the Constitution. Theyll do whatever their employers (the pols) tell them to do. The article conveniently omits the fact the confiscators will be LE. It is honest when is says registration will lead to confiscation.


7 posted on 05/24/2016 5:00:45 AM PDT by 556x45
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: marktwain

Maybe the gun-grabbers can start in Chicago by requiring all gang members to register for a gun safety course. Then, when they show up, they can be disarmed and arrested. Law abiding citizens are already registered - we’re not the problem.


10 posted on 05/24/2016 5:21:30 AM PDT by OrioleFan (Republicans believe every day is July 4th, Democrats believe every day is April 15th.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: marktwain
And "universal background checks" are de facto gun registration.

Which should reveal why leftists are so desperate to get it enacted.

15 posted on 05/24/2016 5:59:46 AM PDT by Trailerpark Badass (There should be a whole lot more going on than throwing bleach, said one woman.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: marktwain

GUN REGISTRATION EXPLAINED BACK IN 1976 BY THE TOP DOG GUN GRABBER.

Nelson T. ‘Pete’ Shields
Founder of Handgun Control, Inc.

“I’m convinced that we have to have federal legislation to build on. We’re going to have to take one step at a time, and the first step is necessarily — given the political realities — going to be very modest.

Of course, it’s true that politicians will then go home and say, ‘This is a great law. The problem is solved.’ And it’s also true that such statements will tend to defuse the gun-control issue for a time.

So then we’ll have to strengthen that law, and then again to strengthen that law, and maybe again and again.

Right now, though, we’d be satisfied not with half a loaf but with a slice. Our ultimate goal — TOTAL CONTROL of handguns in the United States — is going to take time.

My estimate is from seven to ten years. The problem is to slow down the increasing number of handguns sold in this country. The second problem is to get them all registered.

And the final problem is to make the possession of all handguns and all handgun ammunition — except for the military, policemen, licensed security guards, licensed sporting clubs, and licensed gun collectors — TOTALLY ILLEGAL.”

-Pete Shields, Chairman and founder, Handgun Control Inc., “A Reporter At Large: Handguns,” The New Yorker, July 26, 1976, 57-58

“Yes, I’m for an outright ban [on handguns].”

-Pete Shields, Chairman emeritus, Handgun Control, Inc., 60 Minutes interview
(Now you can add rifles and shotguns to the list.)

For those who may still doubt, back in the 1980s HCI decided to go after semi-auto military style rifles along with handguns.


23 posted on 05/24/2016 7:26:40 AM PDT by Ruy Dias de Bivar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: marktwain

‘The Only Person Safe in a Gun-Free Zone Is the Criminal’, Milwaukee County (Wisconsin) Sheriff David A. Clarke Jr.


30 posted on 05/24/2016 9:16:44 AM PDT by BuffaloJack (The reason for Gun Control has always been Government's Fear of Rebellion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson