Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 05/23/2016 2:25:21 PM PDT by ChicagoConservative27
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: ChicagoConservative27

It is good Nan finally admits democrats are socialists, they just dont like calling themselves that.

They do long to reveal their true colors.


2 posted on 05/23/2016 2:27:33 PM PDT by Secret Agent Man (Gone Galt; Not averse to Going Bronson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ChicagoConservative27

Piglosi’s just whistling through the dhimmicrat cesspool


3 posted on 05/23/2016 2:31:25 PM PDT by rockrr (Everything is different now...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ChicagoConservative27

The Whole World Is Watching, Nancy.


4 posted on 05/23/2016 2:43:51 PM PDT by Bernard (The Road To Hell Is Not Paved With Good Results)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ChicagoConservative27
What nan ?

You've pissed off the cankled one and you're nervous ?

5 posted on 05/23/2016 2:44:35 PM PDT by knarf (I say things that are true ... I have no proof, but they're true)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ChicagoConservative27

Yea, but we will need to pass through the election to see what is in it.


8 posted on 05/23/2016 3:01:18 PM PDT by mountainlion (Live well for those that did not make it back.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ChicagoConservative27

What she means is there should only be enough to give Hillary the nomination not enough to boost Sanders over


11 posted on 05/23/2016 3:28:13 PM PDT by Nifster (I see puppy dogs in the clouds)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ChicagoConservative27
She also dismissed comparisons to the riot-fueled 1968 Democratic convention.

1968 happened because after Johnson pulled out party leaders nominated Humphrey, who hadn't participated in any of the primaries. I wouldn't say the current situation is entirely different from 1968. If it weren't for the super-delegates Hillary wouldn't be the nominee, and there are a lot of peeps who think the nomination is being stolen.

12 posted on 05/23/2016 3:28:44 PM PDT by SeeSharp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ChicagoConservative27

I suspect -
That Pelosi is dinging the superdelegates because THEY are the biggest danger (as far as the primary process goes) to Hilary. She is certain to pick up a majority of the the elected/selected delegates. These are required to vote for her.
The superdelegates aren’t bound. They can abandon her at any time, if she looks like a disaster. That can deny her the nomination.


13 posted on 05/23/2016 3:55:45 PM PDT by buwaya
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ChicagoConservative27
When I hear a Dim saying the superdelegates is good for the convention because it allows those who are in the political know some say so in the process I ask them

So you favor giving the home basketball team 25 points before the game starts?

And their answer is (crickets chirping).

14 posted on 05/23/2016 3:58:54 PM PDT by ProudFossil (" I never did give anyone hell. I just told the truth and they thought it was hell." Harry Truman)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ChicagoConservative27

Unless she’s on the winning side.


16 posted on 05/23/2016 4:08:25 PM PDT by TribalPrincess2U (0bama's agenda�Divide and conquer seems to be working.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson