Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Ben Ficklin
Instead you have to try to shoot holes in someone else’s paper, then “teach the controversy”.

I haven't made any attempt to “shoot holes” in anything. NO one other than propagandists ever took Cook's paper seriously, not even cook himself. There is nothing to shoot at. He made no attempt to do anything other than mislead.

Thank you for being such a good example of a global warming alarmist. Despite your claimed training in scientific disciplines, you apparently have no knowledge whatsoever of scientific method. You cannot even articulate what it is you are trying to argue. Can you at least tell us what point or points that you are trying to make? You have said nothing meaningful at all in any of your posts.

49 posted on 05/22/2016 2:44:11 PM PDT by fireman15 (The USA will be toast if the Democrats are able to take the Presidency in 2016)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies ]


To: fireman15
Here's what the Wiki page says:

"The paper was the most downloaded paper for that week across all Institute of Physics' journals, and was widely cited across hundreds of newspapers, magazines, blog posts, and scientific papers from around the world. It also ranked as the 11th most discussed scientific paper of 2013. The paper was awarded the 'Best article of 2013' prize by the editorial board of ERL."

51 posted on 05/22/2016 3:15:18 PM PDT by Ben Ficklin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson