Maybe you can explain to us all why computer models based on the disproven theory that CO2 is a major driver of global temperatures have all had a predictive value less than random chance. What you believe in is a religion not a scientific theory. For a theory to be scientific it must be disprovable by observational data.
It is unfortunate that you seem to have missed the basics of science during all those hours you spent in school and beyond.
Sure, I'll be glad to explain.
You have already lost the argument, that you keep trying to argue. The US has already begun to lower emissions, and will continue to lower emissions. We are burning a lot less coal and replacing it with nat gas and renewables. CAFE stds have risen and will continue to rise. Gasoline consumption in the US peaked in 2007.
One of the big future reductions in CO2 will come from the Ryan budget aka the GOP budget enacted last Dec which extended the renewable energy tax credits for 5 more years.