Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Travis McGee

You’ll also see a lot of “studies” use either 1860 or 1910 (or there about) as a reference. No coincidence that - those were cool years. In the normal fluctuations and cycles of temperature, there are going to be highs, and there are going to be lows. So if you pick a time when those fluctuations and cycles result in several years of relatively low temperature... Well, then everything else starts looking pretty warm in comparison. Data manipulation 101.


19 posted on 05/21/2016 8:15:19 AM PDT by ThunderSleeps (Stop obarma now! Stop the hussein - insane agenda!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]


To: ThunderSleeps

Not to mention all of the thermometer-based temps from before around 1900 are totally wild-ass guesses, because there was no way to regulate thermometers from one location to another.


28 posted on 05/21/2016 8:58:53 AM PDT by Travis McGee (www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson