apparently there is now nothing wrong with bloviating before the facts of the case are known..
“apparently there is now nothing wrong with bloviating before the facts of the case are known..”
___________________________________________-
“bloviating”? Really?
So was my coworker “bloviating” when he commented earlier this morning that this was likely terrorism?
How many more terrorist acts need to take place before we are allowed to “bloviate” about middle eastern flight blowing up?
Some people can’t help but hate the Trump, I guess. :)
Commercial airliner cruising at 35,000 ft suddenly winks off radar. No mayday call. No response when air traffic control attempts to contact the airliner.
What's the most likely reason?
Bloviating would be to leverage the incident into a political event. From what I have gathered, Trump expressed an opinion that it was terrorism, just the same as all of the idiots who said “No evidence of a link to terrorism” immediately after the San Bernardino shootings.
The reason why some Freepers will argue with you is the pejorative nature of your language. While I dislike your characterization of the statement, that is not my main issue.
I disagree with you that it is inappropriate to identify an event that fits the Jihadi paradigm as a likely terrorist attack. Not doing so has become a comically expected farce, to the point of having a cartoon of a news reader that starts off denying such an attack, but ends with “...and it’s muslim terrism.” (paraphrased)