Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: wrench

Yup, but that flight was over land in an area that is known to contain AA batteries of types that *can* bring down such aircraft. It seemed to have been a bomb anyway, though - or such seems to be the multiply official conclusion.

This flight was 170 miles out to sea over the Med, at 37,000 feet. It was nowhere near land and nowhere near where any ground AA could have done anything to or about it. If it wasn’t a bomb/terrorism or mechanical failure, it would have required a major surface combatant (I.e., warship) to track, lock on and launch a missile the size of a telephone pole to bring the airliner down. Last I checked, the terrorists don’t yet have any of those.


310 posted on 05/19/2016 5:04:31 AM PDT by Spktyr (Overwhelmingly superior firepower and the willingness to use it is the only proven peace solution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 303 | View Replies ]


To: Spktyr

Not to mention just the pricetag of a missile capable of intercepting a speeding jetliner at 37,000-feet has to cost a fortune...even more so purchasing through unofficial channels.

338 posted on 05/19/2016 10:06:11 AM PDT by Blue Jays (Rock Hard, Ride Free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 310 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson