Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: NTHockey; Bobalu

NTHockey, Bobalu’s post stated that the doctor advised about the increased danger to the person with Alzheimer’s, and the family made the decision to remove the firearm.

Within a family, safety can absolutely trump the second amendment - just the same as providing a 3 year old with a glock is idiotic and should not be allowed by the family.

This was not a government removal, but a family intervention, based on decreased capacity to understand and remember.


98 posted on 05/18/2016 7:18:32 AM PDT by MortMan (Let's call the push for amnesty what it is: Pedrophilia.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies ]


To: MortMan

Understood. However, one must be careful so that the family decides and not a blanket statement. Otherwise, the regime will jump on that as reason to confiscate a gun. Then several guns. Then all guns.

As always, common sense prevails.


100 posted on 05/18/2016 7:28:39 AM PDT by NTHockey (Rules of engagement #1: Take no prisoners. And to the NSA trolls, FU)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson