Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: CharlesOConnell

Wha?


2 posted on 05/15/2016 1:27:49 AM PDT by BunnySlippers (I Love Bull Markets!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: BunnySlippers

Josiah Du Bois was deputy chief counsel for War Crimes in charge of the I.G. Farben case, Nuremberg, Germany, 1947-48.

RU-486 Connection to the Jewish Holocaust

Zyklon-B (Cyclone) Poison Gas Used in the Nazi Death-Camps was Manufactured by the Same Corporate Group that Makes RU-486

by William Brennan, Ph.D.

The two companies most actively involved in the distribution of RU 486 are Hoechst A.G. of Frankfurt, Germany, and Paris’ Roussel Uclaf.

ZyklonB-RU486

Hoechst is a huge multinational conglomerate with 224 subsidiaries in 124 countries. It does $23.7 billion in sales each year.

Hoechst is the parent firm of Roussel, the company which actually produces and markets this lethal drug. Hoechst owns 100% of Roussel stock.

But Hoechst has a historical reason for keeping a low profile in the RU 486 debate. It is Hoechst’s infamous relationship to the I.G. Farben Chemical Company.

Farben aided the Nazis in waging aggressive warfare and perpetrating crimes against humanity by manufacturing Zyklon B, the cyanide gas used in the Nazi death camps. At Nuremberg, in 1947, 24 Farben executives were charged with war crimes and crimes against humanity.

At Auschwitz Farben exploited slave labor to build the world’s largest synthetic rubber and oil facility. This installation — dubbed “I.G. Auschwitz” — was so huge that it used as much electricity as did the entire city of Berlin. Over 25,000 inmates were worked to death in its construction.

Farben also produced poisonous solutions for use in aggressive warfare and in human experimentation. At Nuremberg, Judge Paul M. Hebert focused on Farben’s extensive contributions to chemical warfare — “research, development and production of mustard gas, tear gas, nitrogen mustard gas, adamsite (throat irritant) and phosgene.” Another segment of the Nuremberg indictment revealed that “poison gases and various deadly pharmaceuticals manufactured by Farben were used in experimentation upon, and the extermination of enslaved persons in concentration camps throughout Europe.”

Farben produced the stabilizer for Zyklon B and owned 42.5% of Degesch (the “German Vermin-Combatting Corporation”), developer of this highly virulent weapon.

“When the Final Solution added Jews to the SS extermination plans, Degesch profits reflected the new prosperity,” concluded Joseph Borkin in The Crime and Punishment of I.G. Farben. “I.G.’s dividends on its Degesch investments for the years 1942, 1943, and 1944 were double those of 1940 and 1941.”

Because of its extensive involvement in such a vast array of destructive activities, the name Farben came to epitomize the ultimate in corporate evil incarnate. Josiah DuBois, chief prosecutor at the Farben Trial, considered the defendants and their crimes so malevolent that he wrote a book about them titled The Devil’s Chemists: 24 Conspirators of the International Farben Cartel Who Manufacture Wars.

The complete dissolution of Farben was therefore considered an indispensable means of assuring the peace after World War II. In 1947 a plan was formulated by the American Military Government to break up Farben into 47 independent units.

However, this never materialized. Concern over the Cold War with Russia and ongoing corporate maneuvering proved to be formidable obstacles. Ultimately, Farben was only divided into three companies: Hoechst, Bayer and BASF.

Since Hoechst has not put the brakes on Roussel Uclaf’s worldwide ambitions to distribute this deadly abortifacient, it is imperative that the alarming kinship between Farben and Hoechst be subjected to widespread public scrutiny. This consciousness-raising process should highlight the following parallels:

486Swastika

Deadly “Medicine”

“In view of the large families of the Slav native population, it could only suit us if girls and women there [Poland and Russia] had as many abortions as possible. Active trade in contraceptives ought to actually be encouraged in the Eastern territories, as we could not possibly have the slightest interest in increasing the non-German population. … We must use every means to instill in the population the idea that it is harmful to have several children, the expenses that they cause and the dangerous effect on woman’s health. … It will be necessary to open special institutions for abortions [‘clinics’] and doctors must be able to help out there in case there is any question of this being a breach of their professional ethics.” – Adolf Hitler, Tischgesprache im Fuhrerhauptquartier, 1941-42.1.

Farben was the largest chemical corporation of its time. Hoechst, according to the business journal Long Range Planning (June 1990), has become “the world’s biggest chemicals business” and intends to maintain this position through an ambitious program of global expansion.

2. Farben was a prominent participation in the chemical war against Jews during the Nazi era. Hoechst is a major participant in the chemical annihilation of the unborn today.

3. Farben made a momentous contribution to the science of chemical warfare by testing its deadly products on victims selected for extermination in Nazi gas chambers. The contribution of Hoechst’s subsidiary, Roussel, to the field of chemical warfare consists of lethal experiments on and the direct killing of unborn children.

4. Farben was the parent company of Degesch, developer of the Zyklon B gas used in the extermination of millions at Auschwitz. Hoechst is the parent firm of Roussel Uclaf, manufacturer of the deadly drug RU 486 capable of destroying millions of unborn children throughout the world.

5. Farben controlled Degesch’s policies, including the decisions to use Zyklon on death camp inmates. Hoechst plays a major role in the policies of Roussel, including the development and distribution of RU 486 for use against the unborn.

6. Farben owned 42.5% of stock in Degesch. Hoechst owns 54.5% of the shares in Roussel.

7. Farben earned enormous profits from its investment in Degesch during the period when Zyklon became the primary means of eradicating the “postnatal expendables” of the Third Reich. Hoechst should derive a considerable payoff from its investment in Roussel if RU 486 ever becomes a widespread method of exterminating today’s “prenatal discards.”

Life Issues Connector, March 1995.


3 posted on 05/15/2016 1:38:42 AM PDT by CharlesOConnell (CharlesOConnell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: BunnySlippers

Sixty-Four Percent (64%) of Aborting Moms “Felt Pressured By Others” (217 sample population)

64Percent217MomsFeltPressureToAbort

MedSciMonitor20041010SR5-16

Induced abortion and traumatic stress: A preliminary comparison of American and Russian women. Vincent M. Rue et al. Med Sci Monit, 2004; 10(10): SR5-16


5 posted on 05/15/2016 1:41:18 AM PDT by CharlesOConnell (CharlesOConnell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: BunnySlippers
Most countries with access to legal abortion have spawned organisations who exist to pay for poor women to have abortions. These organisations, often described as ‘Abortion Funds’, like to portray themselves as grassroots groups; ordinary folk struggling to assist women in crisis.

In fact, they are usually ideology-driven abortion extremists who believe in abortion-on-demand above all things.

And now we know that they are being funded by some of the richest people in the world, including the famed investor and multi-billionaire Warren Buffett.

Warren Buffett

WarrenBuffett

Eradicating the poor, as it were, seems to be the current strategy to eliminate poverty. And, most disturbingly, it seems to be a strategy which is gaining support amongst the better off.

The National Review Online reports that abortion funds have received millions from Buffett, with $115 MILLION in 2011 alone going to all sorts of outfits who advocate abortion.

More than $21 MILLION of that was going to abortion funds. In other words, Buffett is paying for poor women to abort their babies. Now, I find this deeply disturbing. Here’s a man who is literally swimming in cash – and women with a crisis pregnancy often need financial assistance. He could give millions to crisis pregnancy agencies, who let women make real choices which are not dictated by fear and panic: who help mothers to love their children and make a better future for them both.

But instead he pays for poor women to abort their babies

They’ll only get the cash if they want their babies’ lives to be ended.

There’s a real whiff of ruthless control about all of this. Rich, powerful men deciding that babies who are about to be born into poverty are better off dead. It’s abhorrent and completely unacceptable.

Of course, Buffet isn’t the only mega-rich male supporting the abortion industry. Ted Turner, George Soros, Chuck Feeney, Bill Gates, Ross Perot, and many others heap millions on Planned Parenthood and other abortion pushers, as do enormously powerful foundations and corporations such as Google and the Ford Foundation.

BillGates

Bill Gates

GeorgeSoros

George Soros

All of these people will be aware that the abortion industry is quick to use poverty as a justification for abortion. Abortion Inc regularly reports that higher number of abortions are carried out on women living in poverty, and abortion clinics are deliberately established in minority areas, leading to the tragic situation where more than 55% of black babies are aborted in New York city to give just one example.

The research arm of Planned Parenthood, the Guttmacher Institute, recently lamented that the U.S “paid a high price” when economically disadvantaged women continued with their pregnancies.

This relentless propaganda certainly has an effect: a 2000 study by the RAND Corporation found that those in the higher income brackets were considerably more supportive of publicly funding abortions for poor women, while those in lower income brackets opposed abortion funding.

We need to call this out for what it is: a drive to eradicate the poor, rather than to eliminate poverty; to literally kill the opportunities and dreams of poorer children before they even have a chance to be born.

We can do better than this. So can those rich and powerful billionaires.

So, Mr Buffett, why not close your wallet to abortion funds and start investing in Life. It reaps richer rewards in the long term.

6 posted on 05/15/2016 1:44:06 AM PDT by CharlesOConnell (CharlesOConnell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson