Skip to comments.
Arkansas allowed to take $20,000 from innocent man on a technicality
Arkansas Times ^
| Wed, May 11, 2016 at 3:44 PM
| Max Brantley
Posted on 05/12/2016 4:05:15 PM PDT by kingu
--snip--
He was never charged with a crime and the state even dropped its effort to seize the money. But a trial judge wouldn't go along. And the Arkansas Court of Appeals last week refused the appeal to return the cash.
--snip--
But the appellate court instead ruled that civil forfeiture cases must follow the states civil procedure rules, which only allow 10 days after judgment to file motions to vacate, alter, or amend the judgment. In short, he was too late in filing. Since Espinozas motion was untimely, the Court of Appeals dismissed his appeal.
(Excerpt) Read more at arktimes.com ...
TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Government; News/Current Events; US: Arkansas
KEYWORDS: arkansas; assetforfeiture; civilforfeiture; forfeiture
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-33 next last
Ahh yes, we do not wish to give you back your money...
1
posted on
05/12/2016 4:05:15 PM PDT
by
kingu
To: kingu
Your money is innocent of wrongdoing, but we KEEP IT, nonetheless.
BECAUSE.
2
posted on
05/12/2016 4:07:18 PM PDT
by
gaijin
To: kingu
Ahh yes, we do not wish to give you back your money... I won't say what I really think. It's a family forum.
3
posted on
05/12/2016 4:11:02 PM PDT
by
Mark17
(I traded my shackles for a glorious song. I'm free, praise the Lord, free at last.)
To: kingu
The state House should impeach this judge.
4
posted on
05/12/2016 4:11:54 PM PDT
by
Theodore R.
(Trump-Santorum 2016)
To: gaijin
he should request that the state voluntary give back the money and if they don’t this is a real good case to go to the supreme court.
5
posted on
05/12/2016 4:13:34 PM PDT
by
PCPOET7
To: Theodore R.
Is a Federal appeal possible? Unconstitutional taking?
6
posted on
05/12/2016 4:14:40 PM PDT
by
DariusBane
(Liberty and Risk. Flip sides of the same coin. So how much risk will YOU accept? Vive Deo et Vives)
To: kingu
Putting a ten day limit on filing to get back property that was illegally taken? How clever.
To: kingu
I guess Mr. Policeman was not his friend.
To: kingu
These idiots keep this up and they are going to motivate legitimately real Robin Hood’s to stop this crap. Would not want to be law enforcement when innocent people start shooting at law enforcement to protect their money from theft.
9
posted on
05/12/2016 4:22:28 PM PDT
by
Mat_Helm
To: Mark was here
Officer Friendly is actually Officer Fiendly.
10
posted on
05/12/2016 4:38:06 PM PDT
by
DuncanWaring
(The Lord uses the good ones; the bad ones use the Lord.)
To: kingu
It’s all good because DRUGS ARE EVIL
To: Mat_Helm
Yep. It might them think twice, before going out and stealing people’s property.
12
posted on
05/12/2016 4:46:12 PM PDT
by
Mark17
(I traded my shackles for a glorious song. I'm free, praise the Lord, free at last.)
To: PCPOET7
The SC has ruled lyears ago the “civil forfeiture” is constitutional.
13
posted on
05/12/2016 4:47:29 PM PDT
by
Blood of Tyrants
(Liberals are the Taliban of America, trying to tear down any symbol that they don't like.)
To: PCPOET7
The SC ruled years ago that “civil forfeiture” is constitutional.
14
posted on
05/12/2016 4:48:25 PM PDT
by
Blood of Tyrants
(Liberals are the Taliban of America, trying to tear down any symbol that they don't like.)
To: kingu
That judge has an address. Just saying.
L
15
posted on
05/12/2016 4:50:56 PM PDT
by
Lurker
(Violence is rarely the answer. But when it is it is the only answer.)
To: kingu
16
posted on
05/12/2016 4:51:05 PM PDT
by
Darteaus94025
(Can't have a Liberal without a Lie)
To: RegulatorCountry
“Nothing to see here; move along.”
17
posted on
05/12/2016 4:54:35 PM PDT
by
Darteaus94025
(Can't have a Liberal without a Lie)
To: Lurker
That’s what I was just thinking. This crap won’t stop unless there is some personal responsibility/accountability here.
18
posted on
05/12/2016 4:55:40 PM PDT
by
bkopto
To: kingu
I would like to see Trump pledge to do something about this and other abuses in our justice system. It is reprehensible.
19
posted on
05/12/2016 5:05:57 PM PDT
by
beef
(Who Killed Kennewick Man?)
To: kingu
There are no innocent men. Every one of you is guilty of something - we just have to run your FBI file through our RoboProsecutor program to figure out the best state or Federal regulation to charge you under. :)
20
posted on
05/12/2016 5:17:18 PM PDT
by
Mr. Jeeves
([CTRL]-[GALT]-[DELETE])
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-33 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson