Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Arkansas allowed to take $20,000 from innocent man on a technicality
Arkansas Times ^ | Wed, May 11, 2016 at 3:44 PM | Max Brantley

Posted on 05/12/2016 4:05:15 PM PDT by kingu

--snip--

He was never charged with a crime and the state even dropped its effort to seize the money. But a trial judge wouldn't go along. And the Arkansas Court of Appeals last week refused the appeal to return the cash.

--snip--

But the appellate court instead ruled that civil forfeiture cases must follow the state’s civil procedure rules, which only allow 10 days after judgment to file motions “to vacate, alter, or amend the judgment.” In short, he was too late in filing. Since Espinoza’s motion was “untimely,” the Court of Appeals dismissed his appeal.

(Excerpt) Read more at arktimes.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Government; News/Current Events; US: Arkansas
KEYWORDS: arkansas; assetforfeiture; civilforfeiture; forfeiture
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-33 next last
Ahh yes, we do not wish to give you back your money...
1 posted on 05/12/2016 4:05:15 PM PDT by kingu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: kingu

Your money is innocent of wrongdoing, but we KEEP IT, nonetheless.

BECAUSE.


2 posted on 05/12/2016 4:07:18 PM PDT by gaijin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kingu
Ahh yes, we do not wish to give you back your money...

I won't say what I really think. It's a family forum.

3 posted on 05/12/2016 4:11:02 PM PDT by Mark17 (I traded my shackles for a glorious song. I'm free, praise the Lord, free at last.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kingu

The state House should impeach this judge.


4 posted on 05/12/2016 4:11:54 PM PDT by Theodore R. (Trump-Santorum 2016)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gaijin

he should request that the state voluntary give back the money and if they don’t this is a real good case to go to the supreme court.


5 posted on 05/12/2016 4:13:34 PM PDT by PCPOET7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Theodore R.

Is a Federal appeal possible? Unconstitutional taking?


6 posted on 05/12/2016 4:14:40 PM PDT by DariusBane (Liberty and Risk. Flip sides of the same coin. So how much risk will YOU accept? Vive Deo et Vives)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: kingu

Putting a ten day limit on filing to get back property that was illegally taken? How clever.


7 posted on 05/12/2016 4:16:52 PM PDT by RegulatorCountry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kingu

I guess Mr. Policeman was not his friend.


8 posted on 05/12/2016 4:19:02 PM PDT by Mark was here
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kingu

These idiots keep this up and they are going to motivate legitimately real Robin Hood’s to stop this crap. Would not want to be law enforcement when innocent people start shooting at law enforcement to protect their money from theft.


9 posted on 05/12/2016 4:22:28 PM PDT by Mat_Helm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mark was here

Officer Friendly is actually Officer Fiendly.


10 posted on 05/12/2016 4:38:06 PM PDT by DuncanWaring (The Lord uses the good ones; the bad ones use the Lord.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: kingu

It’s all good because DRUGS ARE EVIL


11 posted on 05/12/2016 4:41:04 PM PDT by thoughtomator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mat_Helm

Yep. It might them think twice, before going out and stealing people’s property.


12 posted on 05/12/2016 4:46:12 PM PDT by Mark17 (I traded my shackles for a glorious song. I'm free, praise the Lord, free at last.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: PCPOET7

The SC has ruled lyears ago the “civil forfeiture” is constitutional.


13 posted on 05/12/2016 4:47:29 PM PDT by Blood of Tyrants (Liberals are the Taliban of America, trying to tear down any symbol that they don't like.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: PCPOET7

The SC ruled years ago that “civil forfeiture” is constitutional.


14 posted on 05/12/2016 4:48:25 PM PDT by Blood of Tyrants (Liberals are the Taliban of America, trying to tear down any symbol that they don't like.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: kingu

That judge has an address. Just saying.

L


15 posted on 05/12/2016 4:50:56 PM PDT by Lurker (Violence is rarely the answer. But when it is it is the only answer.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kingu

Law enforcement seized more property from citizens than was stolen by burglars.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/wonk/wp/2015/11/23/cops-took-more-stuff-from-people-than-burglars-did-last-year/


16 posted on 05/12/2016 4:51:05 PM PDT by Darteaus94025 (Can't have a Liberal without a Lie)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RegulatorCountry

“Nothing to see here; move along.”


17 posted on 05/12/2016 4:54:35 PM PDT by Darteaus94025 (Can't have a Liberal without a Lie)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Lurker

That’s what I was just thinking. This crap won’t stop unless there is some personal responsibility/accountability here.


18 posted on 05/12/2016 4:55:40 PM PDT by bkopto
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: kingu

I would like to see Trump pledge to do something about this and other abuses in our justice system. It is reprehensible.


19 posted on 05/12/2016 5:05:57 PM PDT by beef (Who Killed Kennewick Man?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kingu
There are no innocent men. Every one of you is guilty of something - we just have to run your FBI file through our RoboProsecutor program to figure out the best state or Federal regulation to charge you under. :)
20 posted on 05/12/2016 5:17:18 PM PDT by Mr. Jeeves ([CTRL]-[GALT]-[DELETE])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-33 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson