That point about her intending to break classification rules is important, because in order to have broken the law, it isn’t enough for Clinton to have had classified information in a place where it was possible for it to be hacked. She would have had to intentionally given classified information to someone without authorization to have itThis statement (from the article) is a bald-faced lie. The law most definitely NOT require this.
Right you are. The Hillary supporters have a layered defense. First they say she did nothing wrong. When that line is breached, they fall back to saying she did nothing intentionally wrong.
But the law does not require intent for a crime to have been committed. I know that from experience.
Cop: You were going 55 and a 35 mile per hour zone.
Me: But I did not intend to go that fast.
Cop: Too bad. Here's your $110 ticket. You'll be getting points on your driver's license as well.