Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Students asked to submit essays on the subject, "What Obama means to me" will be able to answer in a word, "unemployment."
1 posted on 05/10/2016 9:03:43 AM PDT by Academiadotorg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Academiadotorg

We need to scrub his legacy out of the record, like the Egyptians did to Akhenaten.

(They look alike too.)


2 posted on 05/10/2016 9:06:11 AM PDT by MUDDOG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Academiadotorg

Outside of the technology industry and the finance industry (professions dominated by the coastal regions of the USA), Obama’s legacy will be the erosion of the industrial base and the rapid decline of the middle class.


3 posted on 05/10/2016 9:07:28 AM PDT by RayChuang88 (FairTax: America's Economic Cure)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Academiadotorg

Debt!


4 posted on 05/10/2016 9:13:09 AM PDT by DarthVader (Politicians govern out of self interest, Statesmen govern for a Vision greater than themselves)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Academiadotorg

The list of negatives associated with Obama will fill volumes as history tries to document the carnage.

So let’s start with what legacy has not yet been fully written.

1. He closed Gitmo!
2. War with Iran (backed by Russia and China)
3. The fall of USA credit rating
4. The reason for Austerity in America as subsidies must be cut when America is no longer able to borrow because of the debt ratio. Checks will stop.


5 posted on 05/10/2016 9:27:24 AM PDT by Tenacious 1 (You couldn't pay me enough to be famous for being stupid!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Academiadotorg

The rise of part-time and temp jobs.


6 posted on 05/10/2016 9:30:00 AM PDT by Alcibiades (Save the Republic--NeverHillary.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Academiadotorg
Having just read "The Big Short," about the housing bust in 2007-8, I will concede that there was a banking "crisis" that undoubtedly left a mark on the economy at the time. I'm not convinced however, that anything the government did at the time was solely responsible for the helping the general economy.

It's true that government loans to banks (the "bailouts") helped with the consolidation of some of those institutions, and allowed them to stay afloat and restructure. But I'm not certain that the markets couldn't have come up with a solution on their own.

Even if you believe that the government bailouts helped, Obama and his defenders always likes to sell that period in time as one of irresponsibility on the part of Republicans, especially George W. Bush. Yet, there are no specific Bush administration policies that led to the activities going on at Bear-Sterns, Lehman Bros. or AIG. In fact, the Senate was controlled by Democrats at the time, and one could argue that they overlooked their responsibility to provide oversight to the banking industry.

Regardless, a true historical accounting would show that Obama's "investments" and changes to the banking and financial industries were more damaging than helpful. Instead of a robust period of growth after a recession--especially after nearly 8 years--we're seeing low unemployment numbers with much larger numbers out of the work force completely.

7 posted on 05/10/2016 9:32:49 AM PDT by Lou L (Health "insurance" is NOT the same as health "care")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Academiadotorg

You guys are way too harsh. Everything is great, the Dow is up 195 today! / another super sarc


9 posted on 05/10/2016 11:00:19 AM PDT by VTenigma (The Democratic party is the party of the mathematically challenged)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson