Posted on 05/09/2016 1:46:30 PM PDT by Kaslin
The MSM is the Country’s greatest threat.
They will use whatever lies help them achieve the final agenda.
Only a total freak would be happy with going into a women’s bathroom and seeing some dude in a dress coming out of one of the stalls. So this means that a man who “Feels like a woman” can go into a woman’s bathroom, great just great..rapes are gonna skyrocket and you can blame it all on liberalism, America’s biggest threat
Penis here, vagina there. Forget birth certificates.
My gut told me that when I first saw that.
When are the states going to go all the way to financial independence from the feds in the absolutely necessary state revolt against unconstitutional, as well as noxious, federal acts like this?
Why not ask the question “Should women’s right to privacy be denied by allowing transgender males use of women’s restrooms and locker rooms?”
Why in the world would they include in these surveys shades of approval/disapproval? Allow only “yes” or “no” without any equivocating qualifier, and you’ll get the true answer.
about 0.2 to 0.3 percent of the population, are transgender
Making laws for 0.2% is how the left transforms this country .. and they get by with it... no guts to defy that stupidity.
This is basically a problem between women, as I’ve said before.
This is a problem involving women’s bathroom facilities, and who gets to use them. Within the group called “women,” it’s between the group as a whole and a very liberal subset of that group.
If men were trying to impose this from outside the group, they would be shut down instantly.
So this is a woman-to-woman problem, and therefore there’s absolutely nothing I can do about it, as I’ve said before.
If women want this, they will get it. If they want to stop it, it will be stopped. That’s all.
If it’s so unpopular, there will be politicians who will champion the “women’s safe space” concept, and they will do well in elections. The Democrat left is the source of this initiative, and their fingerprints are all over it.
What will probably happen is that some young women or girls will pay a horrific price for this nonsense, and we’ll have a new named law - “Keisha’s Law” or “Caitlyn’s Law,” that will put things back the way they were. There has to be a human face put on why penises shouldn’t be allowed in the ladies’ room. Once that happens, this will end. And all the stupid politicians who were for it will vanish into the woodwork.
May be factual, may be cruel. Everybody plays the fool. Sometimes.
What has always vexxed me is that the gay population makes up less than 10 percent of the general population. The Trans population must be less than 1/2% of the population.
Are there an influx of Trannies in NC?
I guess what I am getting at is, what prompted the State Legislation propose this bill in the first place?
I have daughters and my wife or I always went in with them when they were little. So, this wouldn’t have been an issue.
Why wouldn’t the rule be: You go in the room where it fits your “equipment.” So, you could identify as a girl, but still urinate through a penis—>mens room. And vice versa.
“Hold the Bible high, set it down and LIE, LIE, LIE” not only applies to certain people, but new organizations and talking heads also...
“Most dishonest group of people on earth, the media”....
Or they could ask the question “Do you produce eggs every month” or “Do you have a period” or “ Have you had your p.... removed” Then , with the right answers they could use the appropriate bathroom. Or better yet, only have private individual washrooms everywhere.
I saw that poll and figured it was asked in a way to get perceived mainstream support for men in women and girls locker rooms.
Rather strangely, it seems there are a great many Americans who want guys in the Ladies Room shaking their wicks at the girls.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.