The one that tries to equate a designed entity (life) changing itself because it was designed to do that with an undersigned entity (static) changing itself into a designed entity (a broadcast signal) for no reason at all.
The one that tries to equate a designed entity (life) changing itself because it was designed to do that with an undersigned entity (static) changing itself into a designed entity (a broadcast signal) for no reason at all.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Well color me confused. I have no idea what argument you’re talking about.
I was ridiculing someone else’s argument as being based on circular logic, he called my rebuttal a non-sequitur, I demonstrated what a non-sequitur was in order to show him he was wrong.
I then gave him more specific information on what logical fallacy he committed in his original argument.
I can’t decipher what you’re talking about versus what I posted earlier.