> (2) using firearms during a drug trafficking crime;
This is actually a gun prohibitionist tactic. Interesting that you support it. Note there is no charge that he fired at anyone or used the firearm in any way.
If you are alleging that possession of a firearm is an act of violence, you are a gun-grabber, pure and simple.
Other than that, there’s not a shred of violence in any of the text you posted. The man sold something that the government didn’t want him to sell, and the government used violence against him. That’s the ONLY violence in this story.
With any luck this will be your new next door neighbor. It appears you fully support his action and lifestyle.