Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: sunrise_sunset
Why exactly? I mean seriously, what would this accomplish?

Ignoring Sanders isn't going to win, why would you not want the scandal-plagued, sky-high-unfavorability Clinton to be the Democratic nominee? Sanders has a better favorable rating, polls better in November, would draw out tons of younger people and, if he won, would make it clear that an avowed socialist could win the White House.

This sounds like the same "brilliant" logic of crossing over to vote for Obama over Clinton in 2008. Yeah, let's have President Sanders.

5 posted on 05/04/2016 12:02:31 AM PDT by Trump20162020
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Trump20162020

I think Sanders would be tougher than Hillary. Trump picks up Sanders voters not Hillary voters. I hope people don’t fall for this.


7 posted on 05/04/2016 12:05:35 AM PDT by niki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: Trump20162020

We’ve had avowed Socialists in the White House since 1913 (1901 if you count Teddy Roosevelt).


9 posted on 05/04/2016 12:06:29 AM PDT by fieldmarshaldj (Resist We Much)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: Trump20162020

“Why exactly? I mean seriously, what would this accomplish?”

+1

Sanders has a lot less scandal baggage than Clinton and looks healthier


11 posted on 05/04/2016 12:10:45 AM PDT by Fai Mao (Just a tropical gardener chatting with friends)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson