[llmc1]

Showing care to children who have no control over the situation is a bad thing?

[nclaurel]

Showing care would have been to return those children safely to their parents and homes not rewarding their breaking the law invading our country. The children were used as pawns from both sides. The "children" who were fully adults are now rioting and are you happy we pay for them and all they destroy?

[KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle]

[lewislynn]

How many did you take in MR./MS. holier than thou?

[sailor76]

Showing care to children who have no control over the situation is a bad thing?

In this case YES.

Lyin-Ted was using those kids as a prop to pander to illegals. I'm sure if those kids needed any care they could have gotten it from an aide worker, NOT a sitting US Senator.

Once again Lyin-Ted shows he is unfit for any public office. He CANNOT be trusted

[CodeToad]

“Showing care to children who have no control over the situation is a bad thing?”

Yes, when you do so at our expense of letting in illegal aliens.

[ek_hornbeck]

Showing care to children who have no control over the situation is a bad thing?

There are plenty of poor children who are US citizens to whom Cruz could have given toys and candy to. The fact that the specifically chose the children of illegals as a charity case sent a political message, whether intended or not: "Welcome illegals."

[detective]

“Showing care to children who have no control over the situation is a bad thing?”

Watch the video.

[Nifster]

Would you let a burglar or killer into your house just because his child rang the doorbell?