Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

FBI Confirms “Enforcement Proceeding” Against Hillary
Young Conservatives ^ | May 2, 2016 | Alicia Powe

Posted on 05/02/2016 6:31:31 AM PDT by xzins

The mainstream media has succeeded in covering up Hillary Clinton’s email scandal and it appears her supporters couldn’t care less about the corruption.

While it seems unlikely that Clinton will be hauled away in handcuffs anytime soon, a new filing by the Justice Department contains a phrase that suggests a criminal prosecution is being planned for the Democratic presidential frontrunner.

From The Federalist Papers:

In the ongoing battle to get access to the e-mails that Hillary sent, or received or tried to destroy, the Justice Department has been forced to respond or explain why certain emails must remain classified.

When a Vice News reporter formally protested the classification of an FBI decision explaining how sensitive information ended up on Hillary’s homebrew server, the Justice Department responded, explaining why:

“They responded in kind by saying they couldn’t make the document public because it would “adversely affect the ongoing investigation” into Clinton’s private email server.

Fair enough, but it is two words further into the DOJ memorandum that will be sure to raise some eyebrows. The department claims it can’t reveal the document because doing so could “reasonably be expected to interfere with enforcement proceedings.”

It’s those two words – “enforcement proceedings”– that may be telling. As Rusty Weiss explains, the phrase “enforcement proceedings” is used in federal law when an “investigation or proceeding involves a possible violation of criminal law.”

The FBI needs to finish this before November for the sake of the nation.

The Clintons are above the law and live by different rules than the rest of us.

General Petraeus or any other State Department official would be on trial already.


TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 2016issues; 2good2betrue; clinton; enforcement; fbi; hillary2016; hillarycriminalprobe; hillaryscandals; indictment; soshillary
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-106 next last
To: xzins

“There’s also this sneaking conspiracy in my mind that says Obama has had a plan to elevate Biden all along WITHOUT Biden having to go through the primary process which he might not have won.

The create a crisis...the indictment of Hillary or the leaking FBI of a thousand cuts...the convention turns elsewhere and who is there and ready?”

Post of the day.

Obama holds all the cards in this play of palace intrigue, and you know good and darned well that he’ll play every one of them to his greatest advantage.

Let us not forget that he holds the ‘get out of jail free’ card, as well. Hillary WILL get her mind right about all this when the time comes. In fact, she may have already done so. After all, she’s only running to stay out of prison anyway.

Your theory is not only plausible, I think it’s probable.


81 posted on 05/02/2016 9:57:27 AM PDT by Windflier (Pitchforks and torches ripen on the vine. Left too long, they become black rifles.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: SaveFerris

Jerry Ford pardoned Nixon BEFORE there was any indictment or trial etc. I think Obama will use the same analogy, and say there was no criminal intent. That it is political issue that he feels gives unfair advantage to the republicans etc etc.

I think the media and public will scream. She might even refuse the pardon, but ask that it not be brought up during the campaign.

Bottom line, he will pardon her, or declare the matter off limits until after the election. The media will insulate her from this being an issue, and will not ask her during the debates or otherwise.

Either way, it will hurt her big time.


82 posted on 05/02/2016 9:59:29 AM PDT by nikos1121
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: usconservative
Truth is, you and I would be hauled off, convicted and imprisoned for far less than this my friend.

I'd settle for what the Rosenbergs got for the crime of espionage. That's what Hillary is guilty of.

83 posted on 05/02/2016 10:37:51 AM PDT by Stentor ("Hiding behind 'conservative' while America goes down the toilet is not acceptable anymore." LS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: nikos1121

I believe that under Martial Law, an election can be cancelled. (Just what I’ve read here on FR in the past.)


84 posted on 05/02/2016 10:44:01 AM PDT by MayflowerMadam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: MayflowerMadam

How is not having a democratic candidate tantamount to declaring Marshall law?


85 posted on 05/02/2016 10:45:47 AM PDT by nikos1121
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: xzins
The FBI needs to finish this before November for the sake of the nation.

Hillary will have her "deal" by the convention and will resign (for health reasons) after the convention is over. You will know this if she picks a very strong VP.

86 posted on 05/02/2016 11:07:46 AM PDT by Mike Darancette (The most vocal supporters of a good con man are the victims.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nikos1121

“How is not having a democratic candidate tantamount to declaring Marshall (sic) law?”

I’m not sure I understand your question. What I posted wasn’t what you inferred, but I may not have been clear. I just think he’s not above manipulating any situation to hold on to the perks he has as President. An election with a candidate-less major party could throw the balance of things into a tizzy. It wouldn’t be “tantamount to”, declaring Martial Law, but more like “a reason to”.

This from Ben Carson:

http://www.commdiginews.com/politics-2/ben-carson-might-obama-cancel-the-2016-election-28523/


87 posted on 05/02/2016 11:16:13 AM PDT by MayflowerMadam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: ManHunter

given that a charge could be filed, is there any way that a replacement ticket could get onto the general election ballots of all the 57 states? to my knowledge Biden has not filed anywhere. does he have time?


88 posted on 05/02/2016 11:45:25 AM PDT by RitchieAprile
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Mike Darancette

such as Joe Biden?


89 posted on 05/02/2016 11:48:16 AM PDT by RitchieAprile
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: xzins
 photo 972d7325-e6ff-482a-82b7-aa033892342a_zpss7wkdqwj.jpg
90 posted on 05/02/2016 11:51:50 AM PDT by timestax (American Media = Domestic Enemy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: timestax
 photo 0b60bf5f-4b1d-47e0-a572-978ecd55a54d_zpsie3jld9s.jpg
91 posted on 05/02/2016 11:53:15 AM PDT by timestax (American Media = Domestic Enemy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: MayflowerMadam

We haven’t cancelled an election in this country through Civil War, World Wars etc. Why would we cancel if it turns out one of the candidates turns out to be a crook?

The other side wins by default.

What if three days before the election a candidate is killed? Other side wins.


92 posted on 05/02/2016 12:40:02 PM PDT by nikos1121
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: RitchieAprile
such as Joe Biden?

Si, exactly so. Can you imagine how pissed Sanders will be to discover that the Democrats nominated a confessed felon just to keep him out.

93 posted on 05/02/2016 12:56:02 PM PDT by Mike Darancette (The most vocal supporters of a good con man are the victims.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: Mike Darancette

Nothing will happen to Hillary


94 posted on 05/02/2016 12:57:49 PM PDT by Ted Grant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: yetidog

>>Possibly a way to extend the Obama presidency based on one party’s incapacity to field a candidate for a yet undetermined period of time.

There’s nothing in the Constitution that says that there has to be a Republican and a Democrat on the ballot.


95 posted on 05/02/2016 1:52:55 PM PDT by Bryanw92 (Sic semper tyrannis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: usconservative

-—Indict. Convict. Imprison.
.
.
.
Let me correct that for you:

Indict, Pardon, end of story


96 posted on 05/02/2016 2:27:01 PM PDT by Bubba Gump Shrimp (Cruz - Fiorina The Outsourcing Ticket)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: nikos1121

Whatever. I give up. Sorry I ruined your day.


97 posted on 05/02/2016 2:51:41 PM PDT by MayflowerMadam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]

To: MayflowerMadam

You can’t ruin my day. Did we have a failure to communicate here? :-)


98 posted on 05/02/2016 3:31:53 PM PDT by nikos1121
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]

To: Valk Rider

Hillary’s indictment is safely on file, in the crate behind the Ark of the Covenant.


99 posted on 05/02/2016 3:55:15 PM PDT by Smokey Stover
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: nikos1121

Perhaps. ;)


100 posted on 05/02/2016 3:58:54 PM PDT by MayflowerMadam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-106 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson