Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 04/30/2016 10:36:42 AM PDT by reaganaut1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last
To: reaganaut1

He’s a little late. Most of the rich New Jersey people living in places like Far Hills moved out years ago. At one time, they lived in New Jersey and commuted to NYC because NJ had better tax rates. Those days are long gone.


2 posted on 04/30/2016 10:42:21 AM PDT by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: reaganaut1

I love stories like that.

I was working foe a public employee union in CA, they go out and denounce capitalism and rich people, etc. The day Facebook went public they were dancing in the aisles over how much tax dollars the state would get from the sale. What hypocrites!


3 posted on 04/30/2016 10:45:00 AM PDT by Rusty0604
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: reaganaut1

I hope to do that to Ct late 16 early 17


4 posted on 04/30/2016 10:48:21 AM PDT by CGASMIA68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: reaganaut1

He’s going to move to Florida where he’ll vote for and give money to the same tax hiking politicians that made New Jersey the Hell hole it is today.

Feel sorry for you peasants in Florida.


5 posted on 04/30/2016 10:52:51 AM PDT by Tzimisce
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: reaganaut1

In the past, government revenue was ‘earned’ from tariffs and customs duties. Lincoln introduced a form of progressive income tax to pay for the US Civil War in 1861. Income tax continued until 1873, as it was viewed as a war-time measure. Except for the brief period of the Wilson-Gorman Act, there was no income tax until the Sixteenth Amendment was ratified in 1913. The government has continued to depend on that Amendment, for thr legislators, it remains the most popular Amendment.

In Canada, the government supported itself successfully through tariffs and customs duties until WW1. After three years of war, the government introduced income tax to support the war, as a ‘temporary measure’... ... Ninety-nine years on, it remains, so to the government, ‘temporary’ means something different than to the average citizen!


7 posted on 04/30/2016 11:09:30 AM PDT by A Formerly Proud Canadian (I once was blind but now I see...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: reaganaut1
The geniuses in government never take human behavior into account. They use their incredibly stupid "static" analysis and conclude that everybody will continue to fork over their income no matter how high tax rates go. Using this approach, they should tax everybody at 100%.

It's not like this is without precedent. From seven years ago in Maryland...

Millionaires Go Missing

Maryland's fleeced taxpayers fight back.

May 27, 2009

Here's a two-minute drill in soak-the-rich economics:

Maryland couldn't balance its budget last year, so the state tried to close the shortfall by fleecing the wealthy. Politicians in Annapolis created a millionaire tax bracket, raising the top marginal income-tax rate to 6.25%. And because cities such as Baltimore and Bethesda also impose income taxes, the state-local tax rate can go as high as 9.45%. Governor Martin O'Malley, a dedicated class warrior, declared that these richest 0.3% of filers were "willing and able to pay their fair share." The Baltimore Sun predicted the rich would "grin and bear it."

One year later, nobody's grinning. One-third of the millionaires have disappeared from Maryland tax rolls. In 2008 roughly 3,000 million-dollar income tax returns were filed by the end of April. This year there were 2,000, which the state comptroller's office concedes is a "substantial decline." On those missing returns, the government collects 6.25% of nothing. Instead of the state coffers gaining the extra $106 million the politicians predicted, millionaires paid $100 million less in taxes than they did last year -- even at higher rates.


10 posted on 04/30/2016 11:16:55 AM PDT by ProtectOurFreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: reaganaut1

If the right 40,000 people in NY moved out the city and state would collapse.


12 posted on 04/30/2016 11:27:02 AM PDT by Donglalinger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: reaganaut1

Incredible how the NY Times views this story through their liberal prism. Most people reading it will logically deduct that Jersey’s most financially successful person left because he was taxed out of the state. The planet Times finds fault that he was financially successful in the first place and that he even existed.


13 posted on 04/30/2016 11:32:31 AM PDT by chuckee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: reaganaut1
“In a time of rising inequality, I’m not sure the right answer is lowering taxes or making them less progressive,” said Kim S. Rueben, senior fellow of the Urban-Brookings Tax Policy Center at the Urban Institute. “It’s more about keeping an eye on people, seeing where they are and enforcing the tax rules.”

In other words, they are going to come up with additional schemes to get more of rich people's money. Government will never be satisfied until they control all of our money and then they will decide how much you need, they'll give that amount back to you, provided that you cooperate with them.

16 posted on 04/30/2016 11:40:23 AM PDT by centurion316
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: reaganaut1

Atlas Shrugged....

He’ll likely go offshore if Trump’s ‘hedge fund tax’ goes national.


19 posted on 04/30/2016 11:53:51 AM PDT by Kent C
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: reaganaut1

How does one earn more than $6 billion in 4 years?!


20 posted on 04/30/2016 12:33:03 PM PDT by Sicon ("All animals are equal, but some animals are more equal than others." - G. Orwell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: reaganaut1
Florida has no personal income tax...

...and much better winters.

23 posted on 04/30/2016 12:49:56 PM PDT by gogeo (Donald Trump. Because it's finally come to that.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: reaganaut1
Back in the early 90's, congress passed a very substantial luxury tax on airplanes, yachts, jewelry, furs and such. It was supposed to bring in millions in additional revenue.

Quoting Geo Will (re-quoted from Neal Boortz)...

...the tax destroyed 330 jobs in jewelry manufacturing, 1,470 in the aircraft industry and 7,600 in the boating industry. The job losses cost the government a total of $24.2 million in unemployment benefits and lost income tax revenues. So the net effect of the taxes was a loss of $7.6 million in fiscal 1991...

Much of the boating construction fled offshore, and never returned although the tax was repealed.

.

24 posted on 04/30/2016 12:56:37 PM PDT by Seaplaner (Never give in. Never give in. Never...except for convictions of honour and good sense. W. Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: reaganaut1

Tax the rich a little more
Tax the rich till the’re poor
Tax the rich every day
Then the rich will go away

Who do we tax when the rich are gone
Can we issue more state bonds
When the state misses the riches cash
The state will tax the middle class


26 posted on 04/30/2016 1:29:40 PM PDT by taxcontrol ( The GOPe treats the conservative base like slaves by taking their votes and refuses to pay)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: reaganaut1

How’s globalism working out of us?


28 posted on 04/30/2016 2:36:00 PM PDT by SaraJohnson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: reaganaut1

The funny thing is that at no point did they even hint that with a big loss in revenue, they will have no choice but to cut spending.


29 posted on 04/30/2016 2:44:38 PM PDT by yefragetuwrabrumuy ("Don't compare me to the almighty, compare me to the alternative." -Obama, 09-24-11)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: reaganaut1

Rush’s fault


30 posted on 04/30/2016 2:46:54 PM PDT by Thibodeaux (leading from behind is following)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: reaganaut1

Did he legitimately ‘earn’ $6 billion in 3 years?


32 posted on 04/30/2016 4:39:17 PM PDT by minnesota_bound
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: reaganaut1

I left NJ 10 years ago.

The handwriting was all over the wall like grafitti even then.


33 posted on 04/30/2016 4:43:21 PM PDT by exit82 (Road Runner sez:" Let's Make America Beeping Great Again! Beep! Beep!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: reaganaut1
Other states are facing similar situations as a greater share of income — and tax revenue — becomes concentrated in the hands of a few...a slimy way of trying to twist the argument to say that too few people have too much money, instead of the real story - that too few people are paying taxes except the very rich who are paying more than their fair share to support a bloated and wasteful government.....
35 posted on 04/30/2016 6:14:02 PM PDT by Intolerant in NJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson