Posted on 04/29/2016 10:12:15 AM PDT by Trumpinator
Might be a berner since klintons like to kill.
This state is overloaded with Sanctuary cities and radical Marxists looking for trouble.
That said- this will gain more support for Trump than his rally did.
I’m a strong supporter of Trump.
But the batman pic... no. haha
Exactly so.
Because, as the founders noted in the Declaration of Independence:
...all experience hath shewn, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed.
It’s gonna take Trump and a whole mess of us! We are up against a giant globalist force that have basically ALL the resources at their disposal.
And yet we still have fools saying “if only more people wouldve voted for Romney!” Or “I refuse to vote for Trump because CRuz is the only true conservative!” IDIOTS and FOOLS!
I am of the opinion that a second US civil war is no longer avoidable. The only questions left are:
-where?
-when?
-what side?
If it were the other way around we would never hear the end of it from the media.
Horn of a bull, hoof of a horse, smile of a Saxon.
I never knew Justin Verlander was a Trump supporter.
Worth repeating again, and again, and again......
So I guess violence back is the only way to stop this....why should Trump supports get the sh*t kicked out of them and no one fights back....hey where the bikers????
“If we’re not gonna make simple sacrifices like losing a day’s pay, how can we be expected to make the ultimate sacrifice? We can’t, is the pure, honest truth of the matter.”
Yes, you are correct.
I do not understand why CWII did not happen 40 or 50 years ago. After some of the things that happened which did not cause CWII/RWII I gave up even considering it.
4. Do you have enough ammunition stored?
5. Have you cleared your field of fire?
That's exactly what Alinsky observed. The successful have jobs and property at risk, so they behave themselves. They aren't fodder to "organize". The person who has nothing to lose is easy to recruit to any manner of action including violence. They have nothing to lose and a possibility to make some gains.
I was reading that we have over 1000 truckers going to Cleveland in their 18 wheeled rigs and several thousand Bikers led bu Cris COX!!. I hereby call for”Pick Up Trucks for Trump” Or “TRUMP TRUCKS”!! Bring your AMERICAN FLAGS and Trump banners and burn some American OIL!! And fly those flags—Baby! Organize in convoys and groups. We will over whelm these communists!! It’s going to be a huge celebration of victory for Trump.
Daniels latest rant about the election is great!
http://www.charliedaniels.com/posts/04-29-16/laymans-point-view
From a Layman’s Point of View
Apr 29 | Posted by: Charlie | Tags: Elections, Politics
There’s a lot to do with the election process that I’ll admit I don’t understand, and I’m sure that a lot of the more cosmopolitan minded pundits and professional practitioners of the art, science, three-ring circus or whatever modern day politics has evolved into, would scoff and say that it was because of my lack of a higher education and sophistication that prevents my enlightenment.
However, I submit that, a person doesn’t need to be a Rhodes Scholar to see that both major political parties have built mechanisms into their primary processes that enable the backroom boys to insert their grubby fingers and affect the outcome.
In fact, the whole thing reminds me of a tax return; convoluted, difficult and confusing, with the rules changed at the whim of the party bosses and their puppet masters to favor or disfavor whatever candidates they deem worthy or otherwise.
We practice a constitutional republic form of government, but nowhere in the U.S. Constitution does it give power to a handful of power brokers and tag-along scalawags who sit behind the scenes and decide who the party candidate will be, completely circumventing the will of the voters.
It’s only logical that when a candidate wins the majority of the votes in a state, they should take the majority of the delegates, but for some reason, known only to the old boys club, that’s not necessarily how it happens.
It’s a mystery to me how sometimes the winning candidate comes out with a few delegates and the rest are “unbound”, and I think that means just about whatever the power players and major donors want it to mean.
And what in the name of Boss Tweed is a superdelegate? Can they fly or leap tall buildings in a single bound or are they just another tool in the establishment box, held in reserve and used to make sure the favorite son (or daughter) of the party hierarchy gets the nomination?
I don’t think anybody in the brain trust of the Democratic Party ever thought that Bernie Sanders would give Mrs. Clinton the run that he has, forcing her to move further to the left than she already is and potentially moving even further to the left in the general election to attract Bernie’s younger voters.
But, I’m sure they were never really concerned because even though Bernie has an attraction to a wider swath of voters than anybody would have thought, he’s not exactly a Barack Obama who came from out of nowhere to steal the Clinton thunder in 2008. They may have had to do a little reshuffling and backed up a couple of times, but this one was always in the bag for Hillary, superdelegates notwithstanding.
On the Republican side, it’s a different ball game.
After spending untold millions of dollars, they have watched their establishment candidates fall like tin ducks in a shooting gallery, with the exception of John Kasich who can’t possibly have any skin left on his teeth, as precarious as his position has been.
That has left the Republican Party with two choices they are choking on, and though they have waited for decades for high profile charismatic candidates, now that that have a couple, they cringe in fear that if elected, he will disrupt the flow of business as usual, the mutual back scratching and back room deals that maintain the status quo.
A changing of the guard for both parties is way overdue and due to the popularity - or maybe I should say notoriety - of Hillary Clinton, it’s probably not going to happen in the Democratic ranks this go around.
But, the Republicans are a horse of a different color, I believe that a brokered, or managed convention that ignores the two top candidates and tries to give the nomination to an insider, could rip the GOP asunder, leaving the good ole boys holding the bag, and an empty one at that.
What do you think?
Pray for our troops and the peace of Jerusalem.
God Bless America
Charlie Daniels
Should our side take the middle of the country? (Oil, fertile ground, enough water to grow crops, the Mississippi River)
If not the middle, then where should our side make our stand?
Well, I can see a natural alignment between conservative values and the eastern Rockies, plains and west of the Appalachians. However, there are a lot of cities within this space that are very liberal. Those pockets would need to be addressed.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.