Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: winoneforthegipper
Trump has obviously found some good speech writers, who may actually be codifying his beliefs. He's also decided to use teleprompters to keep him on the mark. Unfortunately, his skills don't run to prepared speeches and teleprompters.

This was a well written speech, beginning to present much needed messages beyond "beautiful", "liar", "so much/so many", but still omitting details of just how it's going to happen. But it was delivered in a manner even worse than Obama's oft criticized teleprompter Ping-Pong.

Gotta work up some details and gotta work on speech making in lieu of rabble rousing.

29 posted on 04/27/2016 11:06:39 AM PDT by norton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: norton

The text of the speech...

- APRIL 27, 2016 -

DONALD J. TRUMP FOREIGN POLICY SPEECH

https://www.donaldjtrump.com/press-releases/donald-j.-trump-foreign-policy-speech


30 posted on 04/27/2016 11:12:30 AM PDT by deks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]

To: norton

Couldn’t disagree more. The delivery was methodical and easy for me to understand. Basic details were obvious to me like asking other allies to pay their fair share and at least attempt some negotiations with Russia to improve relations.


32 posted on 04/27/2016 11:13:16 AM PDT by Kahuna
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]

To: norton

And yet unlike Obama, Trump isn’t in front of a kindergarten class with teleprompters. This was a fine policy speech. And you want to make sure you get it right. And he’s not a seasoned politician who’s used to teleprompters. He actually has brain and he uses it when he speaks without a Teleprompter.


35 posted on 04/27/2016 11:23:58 AM PDT by Not gonna take it anymore (If Obama were twice as smart as he is, he would be a wit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]

To: norton

This was a well written speech, beginning to present much needed messages beyond “beautiful”, “liar”, “so much/so many”, but still omitting details of just how it’s going to happen.”

I disagree. If you are not going to bomb a country randomly, for example, Iraq, what details do you need? How much specifics and explanation are needed for “doing nothing”?

Once you decide to not invade a country randomly, that’s the end of the decision. No further details or specifics needed. It is done.


37 posted on 04/27/2016 1:05:43 PM PDT by TTFX
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson