This was a well written speech, beginning to present much needed messages beyond "beautiful", "liar", "so much/so many", but still omitting details of just how it's going to happen. But it was delivered in a manner even worse than Obama's oft criticized teleprompter Ping-Pong.
Gotta work up some details and gotta work on speech making in lieu of rabble rousing.
The text of the speech...
- APRIL 27, 2016 -
DONALD J. TRUMP FOREIGN POLICY SPEECH
https://www.donaldjtrump.com/press-releases/donald-j.-trump-foreign-policy-speech
Couldn’t disagree more. The delivery was methodical and easy for me to understand. Basic details were obvious to me like asking other allies to pay their fair share and at least attempt some negotiations with Russia to improve relations.
And yet unlike Obama, Trump isn’t in front of a kindergarten class with teleprompters. This was a fine policy speech. And you want to make sure you get it right. And he’s not a seasoned politician who’s used to teleprompters. He actually has brain and he uses it when he speaks without a Teleprompter.
This was a well written speech, beginning to present much needed messages beyond “beautiful”, “liar”, “so much/so many”, but still omitting details of just how it’s going to happen.”
I disagree. If you are not going to bomb a country randomly, for example, Iraq, what details do you need? How much specifics and explanation are needed for “doing nothing”?
Once you decide to not invade a country randomly, that’s the end of the decision. No further details or specifics needed. It is done.