So you argue the courts can negate language of the Constitution specifically the limitations of why they can own land limiting to military and other “needful” buildings.
No such limitation exists. As Article IV, section 3 says.
37 posted on 04/26/2016 5:40:34 PM PDT by DoodleDawg
The constitution allows for no conflicts. Your argument removes a specific limitation. Not saying our activist courts will not buy it, but it does negate a part.
42 posted on 04/26/2016 7:05:25 PM PDT by Mechanicos
(Trump is for America First. Cruz is for America Last. It's that simple.)