Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: jdege
He’s right, of course. All of the public lands should have been turned over to the state, when the territory became a state.

Nothing requires the federal government from doing do, and the Oregon Enabling Act specified what went to the state and what remained with the government.

But there’s no way the courts will agree with him.

No reason why they should.

29 posted on 04/26/2016 3:39:24 PM PDT by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]


To: DoodleDawg

The Constitution grants the federal government authority over “Places purchased by the Consent of the Legislature of the State in which the Same shall be, for the Erection of Forts, Magazines, Arsenals, dock-Yards, and other needful Buildings” - and nothing else.


38 posted on 04/26/2016 5:42:26 PM PDT by jdege
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]

To: DoodleDawg

No reason why they should.


Easy for you to say, writing from Missouri where the Feds own a wopping 3.0%.

It goes against the principals of equality and self-government.

Having grown up in a county that was over 80% federally owned, it matters. Why should most of the rest of the country run (and ruin) our lives.


40 posted on 04/26/2016 6:40:49 PM PDT by Hieronymus ( (It is terrible to contemplate how few politicians are hanged. --G. K. Chesterton))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson