Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SMGFan

Truly does suck for them, but why should the original owner from it was stolen not get his property back?


4 posted on 04/25/2016 3:51:59 PM PDT by Wyrd bið ful aræd (Don't Tread On Me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Wyrd bið ful aræd

*from whom


5 posted on 04/25/2016 3:52:12 PM PDT by Wyrd bið ful aræd (Don't Tread On Me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: Wyrd bið ful aræd

Wonder if they knew that it was stolen.

Or if a deal is too good to be true, then it probably is... too good to be true.


6 posted on 04/25/2016 4:03:22 PM PDT by dhs12345
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: Wyrd bið ful aræd

Probably going to be the insurance company that ends up with title to the stone. The original owner probably got the insurance payout more than 10 years ago. If it was underinsured, the original owner might have some claim to the excess over what the payout was.


9 posted on 04/25/2016 4:08:20 PM PDT by PAR35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: Wyrd bið ful aræd

Also, why should the person who sold it to them, get to keep the money they got from it?


15 posted on 04/25/2016 4:20:47 PM PDT by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: Wyrd bið ful aræd

I agree that the original owner should get his property back, but if he received an insurance settlement for his loss, he should give that money back.


27 posted on 04/26/2016 4:55:34 AM PDT by Fresh Wind (Hey now baby, get into my big black car, I just want to show you what my politics are.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson