Truly does suck for them, but why should the original owner from it was stolen not get his property back?
*from whom
Wonder if they knew that it was stolen.
Or if a deal is too good to be true, then it probably is... too good to be true.
Probably going to be the insurance company that ends up with title to the stone. The original owner probably got the insurance payout more than 10 years ago. If it was underinsured, the original owner might have some claim to the excess over what the payout was.
Also, why should the person who sold it to them, get to keep the money they got from it?
I agree that the original owner should get his property back, but if he received an insurance settlement for his loss, he should give that money back.