Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-27 next last
To: The_Victor
AMERICANS! Your government has taken you by the scruff of your collective necks and shaken all the sense out of you. How could a people be so stupid as to let the government dictate such bizarre things?
2 posted on
04/25/2016 7:02:31 AM PDT by
Don Corleone
("Oil the gun..eat the cannoli. Take it to the Mattress.")
To: The_Victor
Further proof that allowing the government to choose the winners and losers is a lose-lose proposition, every time. Free market, when allowed to work, will always operate more effectively and provide a net benefit.
3 posted on
04/25/2016 7:03:44 AM PDT by
T-Bird45
(It feels like the seventies, and it shouldn't.)
To: The_Victor
Of course, it will cost $30 each.
4 posted on
04/25/2016 7:04:53 AM PDT by
Da Bilge Troll
(Defeatism is not a winning strategy!)
To: The_Victor
Who ever would have believed that our government has been reduced to passing laws regulating flush toilets and light bulbs?
5 posted on
04/25/2016 7:06:31 AM PDT by
IronJack
To: The_Victor
I’m liking the new LED bulbs.
The CFL’s are dangerous garbage. I’ve had them blowup and shoot sparks out of the base.
7 posted on
04/25/2016 7:08:32 AM PDT by
headstamp 2
(Fear is the mind killer.)
To: The_Victor
Well, if it’s an efficiency-based standard, this new technology would not be against the law.
The key here is that it isn’t a straight black-body radiator—non-visible radiation from the filament is used to excite photons in the visible range from the surrounding crystal.
Very cool (or hot, if you like).
8 posted on
04/25/2016 7:10:10 AM PDT by
Pearls Before Swine
(The would-be Empress has no clothes. My eyes!)
To: The_Victor
When the market is allowed to work, it works.
9 posted on
04/25/2016 7:10:54 AM PDT by
arthurus
(Het is waar. Tutti i liberali sono feccia.)
To: The_Victor
Actually, Thomas Edison invented a better incandescent light bulb a long time ago. I remember when I visited his lab as a kid they had original light bulbs still burning 75+ years on. I think he just realized that if the light bulb never burned out, you could only sell one set to each customer, so he included “planned obsolescence” in his product.
To: The_Victor
I do like the soft LEDs, but they're so expensive. We never converted any lights to the CFLs. And I do miss the incandescents......I loved putting a scent ring on them for a very subtle vanilla aroma in some of our rooms.
12 posted on
04/25/2016 7:18:23 AM PDT by
originalbuckeye
("In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act." - George Orwell)
To: The_Victor
I do NOT want my incandescent light bulbs to be more efficient. They warm my home in the winter.
To: The_Victor
Obama’s Green Jobs Factories are empty
To: The_Victor
Heresy!
Racism!
Climate Change Deniers!!!
Rescind their research grants!!!
Off with their heads!
30 posted on
04/25/2016 7:31:41 AM PDT by
MrBambaLaMamba
(Obama - "I will stand with the Muslims")
To: The_Victor
I like incadecents . I will use incadecents . The jack hole that introduced the ban ought IMHO be publically castrated .
33 posted on
04/25/2016 7:34:39 AM PDT by
Jimmy Valentine
(DemocRATS - when they speak, they lie; when they are silent, they are stealing the American Dream)
To: The_Victor
One of the big problems with incandescent bulbs was caused by the industry it’s self.
Early incandescent bulbs had a vacuum inside the glass envelop. about 3 decades ago, they found that they were much cheaper to manufacture, if instead of evacuating the bulb, they filled it with the inert gas Argon.
The vacuum of course doesn’t conduct heat, leaving it inside the bulb. Argon conducts the heat to the outside of the bulb, raising the temperature of the glass and wasting it into the environment.
This was the point where incandescent bulbs became very much less efficient.
34 posted on
04/25/2016 7:35:52 AM PDT by
babygene
(Make America Great Again)
To: The_Victor
This is the same government that thinks they know best about our healthcare.
And we have let them get away with it.
35 posted on
04/25/2016 7:36:37 AM PDT by
unixfox
(Abolish Slavery, Repeal the 16th Amendment)
To: The_Victor
I often wonder how much Mercury was dumped into the environment by all those CFL bulbs.
40 posted on
04/25/2016 7:45:56 AM PDT by
The Great RJ
("Socialists are happy until they run out of other people's money." Margaret Thatcher)
To: The_Victor
This concept is too little too late. Its still not as efficient as LED’s.
To: The_Victor
All light is not equal, according to biological organisms.
This was strongly established by photographer John Ott. And the Ott light bulbs are still regarded as the best available full spectrum lighting.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Ott
By increasing or decreasing the various light bands in the spectrum, he was able to manipulate plants to flower, bear fruit, and even change the gender of plants.
So every time you read of a new kind of light bulb, be aware that its light might indeed be bright, but not very healthy for you at all.
52 posted on
04/25/2016 8:22:11 AM PDT by
yefragetuwrabrumuy
("Don't compare me to the almighty, compare me to the alternative." -Obama, 09-24-11)
To: The_Victor
They can have my A12's when they pry them from my cold dead hands.
60 posted on
04/25/2016 8:47:07 AM PDT by
yuleeyahoo
( Man does not control his own fate. The women in his life do that for him. - Groucho Marx)
To: The_Victor
We no longer claim to be the “Land of the Free”. You are not free when you are forbidden by Fed Gov to be able to buy an incandescent light bulb.
National Death by Bureaucrap.
62 posted on
04/25/2016 8:50:27 AM PDT by
Texas Fossil
((Texas is not where you were born, but a Free State of Heart, Mind & Attitude!))
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-27 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson