Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

US State Department approves $260 million missile sale to Qatar (RAM SAMs)
DOHA NEWS ^ | Apr 24, 2016 | PETER KOVESSY

Posted on 04/25/2016 4:52:25 AM PDT by sukhoi-30mki

Qatar’s purchase of 254 surface-to-air missiles from an American weapons manufacturer has cleared a major hurdle after securing the approval of the US State Department.

The Defense Security Cooperation Agency announced the decision regarding the $260 million order from Raytheon Missile Systems in a statement published over the weekend.

The agency stated that selling the weapons to Qatar would improve the national security of the US “by helping to improve the security of a friendly country.”

It continued:

“Qatar is an important force for political stability and economic progress in the (Gulf) region. This proposed sale will provide Qatar with military capabilities to protect its naval forces and nearby oil/gas infrastructure from air and missile threats.” It added that the missile sale “will not alter the basic military balance in the region.”

Arms buildup

However, questions about the region’s military balance have appeared to stall other arms deals involving Qatar and US firms.

For example, US ally Israel’s concerns about its “qualitative military edge” have reportedly been one of the factors holding up the sale of 36 F-35 fighter jets from Boeing to Qatar, although Reuters cited unnamed defense officials last week as saying a deal is imminent.

Qatar has been rapidly building up its weapons arsenal in recent years, ordering billions of dollars worth of tanks, attack helicopters, warships, artillery and coastal battery systems.

The Raytheon deal includes two variations of the company’s RIM-116C rolling airframe missiles, which rotate in the air like a bullet fired from a gun.

The US Navy describes the weapons as a “high-firepower, low-cost, self-defense system against anti-ship cruise missiles … and asymmetric air and surface threats.”

The State Department’s approval of the deal came shortly after US President Barack Obama met GCC leaders in Riyadh last week in a visit many interpreted as an effort to shore up the relationship between the US and the Gulf states.

According to the US Defense Security Cooperation Agency, Congress would have to pass legislation prohibiting or modifying the proposed sale in order for the deal to be blocked.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: armsbuildup; qatar; ram; raytheon

U.S. Navy

The USS New Orleans fires a surface to air intercept missile from it\’s Rolling Airframe Missile launcher while off the coast of California during a live-fire exercise in 2013.

1 posted on 04/25/2016 4:52:25 AM PDT by sukhoi-30mki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

Whose airplanes threaten Qatar?


2 posted on 04/25/2016 4:56:32 AM PDT by BenLurkin (The above is not a statement of fact. It is either satire or opinion. Or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

Persia’s. And its drones and missiles.


3 posted on 04/25/2016 5:20:24 AM PDT by Lonesome in Massachussets (The Democratic Party strongly supports full Civil Rights for Necro-Americans!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

Iran silly..... pay attention


4 posted on 04/25/2016 5:23:38 AM PDT by bert ((K.E.; N.P.; GOPc;+12, 73, ....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

“Qatar is a significant power in the Arab world, supporting several rebel groups during the Arab Spring both financially and through its globally expanding media group, Al Jazeera Media Network”

The real reason, right here. 0bama’s buddies.


5 posted on 04/25/2016 5:30:38 AM PDT by wrench
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wrench

Well, there goes the last of the GITMO prisoners. Each missile gets a personal jihadi security detail for the boat trip to port in Qatar.


6 posted on 04/25/2016 5:38:39 AM PDT by blackdog (There is no such thing as healing, only a balance between destructive and constructive forces.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson