Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: exDemMom
Once again you have taken a very reasonable and responsible position. The problem with the all or nothing approach being advocated by some is that you are going to get nothing rather than get the easy 93% of abortions for which their was no excuse other than personal irresponsibility and laziness.

While it is morally repugnant to put a cost on human life, we have evolved into a society where most responsible people simply cannot afford more than 2-3 children. Regrettably an additional unwanted child may mean not just a burden, but economic ruin. It is a reality that has to be factored into this when one considers banning the small percentage for rape or medical reasons.

80 posted on 04/25/2016 5:13:27 AM PDT by AndyJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies ]


To: AndyJackson
Once again you have taken a very reasonable and responsible position. The problem with the all or nothing approach being advocated by some is that you are going to get nothing rather than get the easy 93% of abortions for which their was no excuse other than personal irresponsibility and laziness.

Thank you!

I don't want to give up on the 80% or 90% of babies now being aborted, whose lives could be prevented if their mothers could be taught to value life and be responsible, just because getting that 100% solution is not, and may never be, possible.

101 posted on 04/25/2016 5:02:49 PM PDT by exDemMom (Current visual of the hole the US continues to dig itself into: http://www.usdebtclock.org/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson