[PapaBear3625]

Pro-lifers, faced with the choice of somebody who is apparently soft on the subject of life and somebody who is radically pro-abortion will obviously go with the former.

That's not what I've seen, for the case of a soft Republican versus a radical pro-abort Dem. There are pro-Lifers, including here on FR, who would rather the Dem win. They figure that if they can block soft Repubs from being elected, that eventually the Repubs will nominate a hard-line pro-Lifer.

That never happen, though, since the GOP Establishment would rather lose than oppose the Dems in any fundamental way.

[Smokin' Joe]

That's not what I've seen, for the case of a soft Republican versus a radical pro-abort Dem. There are pro-Lifers, including here on FR, who would rather the Dem win.

You just don't get it, do you. I have maybe 20 years left on this earth at best. What happens after that will last a lot longer.

How can I stand before my creator having voted for anyone who supports the slaughter of the unborn--whether they "only" support the murder of some innocents or the wholesale slaughter of innocents, there has been an alternative candidate this election cycle.

If I have to, I will write in his name.

As it stands, I won't vote to reelect anyone.

But I cannot support someone who supports abortion, period.