Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: jdsteel

Sorry, but the courts do not agree with the three class of citizenship argument.

There are two:

“Natural” i.e. a citizen at the moment of birth,

“Naturalized,” a person citizen at some point later in life, by application of the person desiring to be a citizen or someone acting for them.

USC 1401 is the current law on this.


91 posted on 04/22/2016 3:31:29 PM PDT by Strac6 (The primaries are only the semi-finals. ALL THAT MATTERS IS DEFEATING HILLARY IN NOVEMBER.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies ]


To: Strac6

How dare you distort what natural born US citizenship means. No court or act of congress can stamp anyone a natural born US citizen. Only two US citizen parents birthing their child on US soil can bequeath natural born US citizenship. Used to be the liberals had the intent to subvert the original intent. No longer the case, fake conservatives now carry the liberal’s dark water.


92 posted on 04/22/2016 3:47:08 PM PDT by Just mythoughts (Jesus said Luke 17:32 Remember Lot's wife.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies ]

To: Strac6
Sorry, but the courts do not agree with the three class of citizenship argument.

The fact that the courts agree or disagree on anything is irrelevant to the truth. Currently the courts "agree" that two homosexuals can get "married" though the word "Matrimony" literally means "Ceremony to create a mother."

“Natural” i.e. a citizen at the moment of birth,

Non-sequitur. Citizen at the moment of birth does not mean "natural citizen." People who are "naturalized at birth" are citizens at birth, but they are "naturalized citizens", not "natural citizens."

“Naturalized,” a person citizen at some point later in life, by application of the person desiring to be a citizen or someone acting for them.

Nonsense. Congress can specify whenever they like that someone becomes a citizen. They could naturalize them at two years old if they wanted to. The fact that Congress chose to write a law to naturalize them "at birth" still makes them naturalized.

USC 1401 is the current law on this.

USC 1401 has no effect on natural law constants. It also does not amend the US Constitution.

100 posted on 04/22/2016 4:45:07 PM PDT by DiogenesLamp ("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies ]

To: Strac6; jdsteel

You know damn well there is no law, current or otherwise, that defines Natural Born Citizen.

The USC 1201 you continually post does not say what you pretend it says. You may be a lawyer but that doesn’t mean you know what you are talking about. In fact, you’re a slimy little person who has a purpose on FR and that purpose is not to pursue truth.


103 posted on 04/22/2016 4:48:26 PM PDT by little jeremiah (Half the truth is often a great lie. B. Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies ]

To: Strac6

Then you and I agree.


141 posted on 04/23/2016 4:50:02 AM PDT by jdsteel (Give me freedom, not more government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson