Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Tau Food

They serve a ministerial function. They have no authority to inquire into the age, citizenship, or residency requirements specified by Art. II. They vote. Period.


223 posted on 04/25/2016 9:06:56 PM PDT by Ray76 (Judge Roy Moore for Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 222 | View Replies ]


To: Ray76
They serve a ministerial function. They have no authority to inquire into the age, citizenship, or residency requirements specified by Art. II. They vote. Period.

Maybe you're familiar with the Federalist Papers written by James Madison, Alexander Hamilton and John Jay. Federalist Number 68 concerns "The Mode of Selecting the President."

Federalist No. 68 explains why such an important function (choosing a President) was delegated to a small number of very important persons (electors):

"It was equally desirable, that the immediate election should be made by men (the electors) most capable of analyzing the qualities adapted to the station, and acting under circumstances favorable to deliberation, and to a judicious combination of all the reasons and inducements which were proper to govern their choice. A small number of persons, selected by their fellow-citizens from the general mass, will be most likely to possess the information and discernment requisite to such complicated investigations."

Obviously, the Founding Fathers thought that choosing a president required "complicated investigations" and that the selection of a president should be made by people "most capable of analyzing the qualities adapted to the station, and acting under circumstances favorable to deliberation, and to a judicious combination of all the reasons and inducements which were proper to govern their choice."

The Founding Fathers saw the job of an elector as being much more than the perfunctory, ministerial function that you envision for them.

224 posted on 04/25/2016 9:30:06 PM PDT by Tau Food (Never give a sword to a man who can't dance.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 223 | View Replies ]

To: Ray76
According to Federalist 68, it was also felt by the Founders that the Constitution's procedures "affords a moral certainty, that the office of President will never fall to the lot of any man who is not in an eminent degree endowed with the requisite qualifications." I agree with the suggestion that if we just continue to trust the constitution's provisions for selecting our presidents, we can be confident (to a "moral certainty") that the electors will not choose anyone who is not "endowed with the requisite qualifications."

It has to be conceded that a "moral certainty" level of confidence does still allow for some small possibility of error, but no system is 100% perfect. We shouldn't abandon a system just because we may be unhappy (for other reasons) with the selection of a particular president.

226 posted on 04/25/2016 9:45:31 PM PDT by Tau Food (Never give a sword to a man who can't dance.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 223 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson