I heard some speculation about his motive and that was to remove and destroy the copy that had Clinton's hand-written comments in the margin, though no speculation of what those comments might have been. This makes some sense because there were other copies of the documents that Berger stole.
In a way the real story is the difference of how this was portrayed in the media. I mean, can you imagine if a Republican president's National Security Advisor stole documents from the National Archives? And can you imagine if a Republican administration sold M-16s to Mexican drug lords? It would be quite different and we all know it.
Be back bump