Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: fortheDeclaration

Again, we’re talking about a presidential candidate taking two positions on an issue within a span of 12 hours in front of two different audiences. If you don’t see the contradiction in that, you’re looking for an excuse.

Of course he “expanded” his thoughts. He got slammed for his original thoughts.

I’m not a fan of Cruz either. That said, I’m confident that Cruz would have expressed his personal opinion on the matter and then immediately addressed the constitutionality of the NC law. He would not have had to expand on that part of his answer later after thinking about it some more. Constitutional matters are instinct to Cruz. That’s why he belongs on SCOTUS.


296 posted on 04/22/2016 1:58:54 PM PDT by BuckeyeTexan (There are those that break and bend. I'm the other kind. ~Steve Earle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 295 | View Replies ]


To: BuckeyeTexan
There were not two different positions given, there was an elaboration of the original opinion given.

1. Trump says that the ordinance NC made is a mistake.

2. Trump says the States should decide.

Those are not mutually exclusive positions.

As for his original position, he was pointing out that transgender's have been using the opposite sex's bathrooms, making a new law isn't going to change it, but it will allow the Left to bring in the Federal government, which is their intent.

297 posted on 04/22/2016 2:14:32 PM PDT by fortheDeclaration (Pr 14:34 Righteousness exalteth a nation:but sin is a reproach to any people)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 296 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson