Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Supreme Court split on Obama amnesty; Kennedy: Policy ‘just upside-down’
The Washington Times ^ | April 18, 2016 | Stephen Dinan

Posted on 04/18/2016 10:40:25 AM PDT by jazusamo

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-69 next last

1 posted on 04/18/2016 10:40:25 AM PDT by jazusamo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

This can’t be true...the Court found something they shouldn’t have the last word on?


2 posted on 04/18/2016 10:42:11 AM PDT by gogeo (Donald Trump. Because it's finally come to that.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

What happens if it is 4-4?


3 posted on 04/18/2016 10:42:40 AM PDT by tbw2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BuckeyeTexan

Ping!


4 posted on 04/18/2016 10:42:56 AM PDT by jazusamo (Have YOU Donated to Free Republic? https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tbw2

In a tie, the prior lower court ruling stands...which would be the correct ruling.


5 posted on 04/18/2016 10:44:29 AM PDT by alancarp (There are not enough laxatives in the world to cure that what ails Democrats.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: tbw2

But with the death of Justice Antonin Scalia, the eight-member court could deadlock 4-4. That would leave the appeals court’s decision in place, which would be a victory for Mr. Obama’s opponents.

A tie ruling, though, would also mean the court wouldn’t issue a definitive statement on Mr. Obama’s claims of power. That would leave for a future court the question of just how far a president can go to shape or, as Mr. Obama said, to “change” the law on his — or her — own.


6 posted on 04/18/2016 10:44:39 AM PDT by A_Former_Democrat (This household proudly voted for TRUMP)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: tbw2

It reverts to the appeals court decision which was in favor of Texas.


7 posted on 04/18/2016 10:44:39 AM PDT by xzins ( Free Republic Gives YOU a voice heard around the globe. Support the Freepathon!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: tbw2

whatever the appeals court ruled would stand.


8 posted on 04/18/2016 10:44:51 AM PDT by TexasFreeper2009 (You can't spell Hillary without using the letters L, I, A, R)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: gogeo

I’m just spit balling here but could it be that Kennedy (known sometimes for sometimes counterintuitive against the liberal line of thinking biasing towards fairness) is just thinking “eventually I’m going to have to stand tall at the gates and admit the truth of what I’ve done?”


9 posted on 04/18/2016 10:45:22 AM PDT by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: tbw2

the lower court ruling — which froze nearly all aspects of the executive order — remains in effect


10 posted on 04/18/2016 10:45:44 AM PDT by JohnBrowdie (http://forum.stink-eye.net)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: tbw2

It’ll be a loss for now for 0bama, the appeals court ruled against him so this will come up again when there’s nine Justices.


11 posted on 04/18/2016 10:46:28 AM PDT by jazusamo (Have YOU Donated to Free Republic? https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: gogeo

If Scotus sides with Obama, then they have said that Congress is irrelevant, that the executive creates legislation from thin air.

They should watch out, though, because it means they also are ruling against their own real exercise of authority.


12 posted on 04/18/2016 10:47:20 AM PDT by xzins ( Free Republic Gives YOU a voice heard around the globe. Support the Freepathon!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: tbw2

The appeals court ruling against Obama stands


13 posted on 04/18/2016 10:48:14 AM PDT by Lurkinanloomin (Know Islam, No peace - No Islam, Know Peace)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

“Demanding legal status.” ... Demanding.


14 posted on 04/18/2016 10:48:40 AM PDT by cld51860 (Volo pro veritas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

“It’s as if the president is setting the policy and Congress is executing it. That’s just upside-down,” said Justice Anthony M. Kennedy,

*****************************

A little honesty...............


15 posted on 04/18/2016 10:50:09 AM PDT by Lurkinanloomin (Know Islam, No peace - No Islam, Know Peace)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tbw2

The Court of Appeals’ decision stands but cannot be cited as precedent, meaning Obola will be blocked, but a future president can still attempt legally to do the same thing.


16 posted on 04/18/2016 10:50:36 AM PDT by libstripper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: tbw2

The lower court finding stands. A victory for Texas and their fight against illegals.


17 posted on 04/18/2016 10:50:51 AM PDT by pfflier
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

The Leftist robots on the court will vote whichever way present politics dictates


18 posted on 04/18/2016 10:50:53 AM PDT by PGR88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tbw2

The lower court ruling stays


19 posted on 04/18/2016 10:51:26 AM PDT by hoosiermama (W1240 (a couple extra to boot) Under budget. Ahead of schedule! Go TRUMP)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

Reading in between the lines, it looks like the liberal Supreme court Justices would rather not hear the case because they couldn’t rationally find justification for allowing Obama to usurp the role of Congress.

Prediction: 5-3 to uphold the appeal courts decision.


20 posted on 04/18/2016 10:51:46 AM PDT by Fhios (Going Donald Trump is as close to going John Galt as we'll get.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-69 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson