Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: D-fendr

Oh, so my error?

These states polling big for TRUMP were allowed to cast a vote directly for him, a ballot with his name on the damn thing?

My mistake.

Reading the news, I thought the rubes were not permitted to vote directly for candidates, but only delegates.

I read poorly. How embarrassing.

The reports are that these particular states simply voted for delegates, who knew better how to determine the peoples choice for them, you know... to make the loser, the winner.

Silly me.


92 posted on 04/18/2016 10:05:26 AM PDT by RitaOK ( VIVA CRISTO REY / Public education is the farm team for more Marxists coming)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies ]


To: RitaOK
Trump got a whole lot more delegates than votes. Why is that fair? Aren't these non-Trump voters disenfranchised. >>>the rubes were not permitted to vote directly for candidates.. Depends. One does have to know what they're doing. The candidate has to organize people who know what their doing. Should be Trump's strong suit, yes? But, you are wrong in some cases. Here's the voting results in Freemont County, WY. Cruz 64 ✔ Kaisich Rubio Trump 33
95 posted on 04/18/2016 10:11:17 AM PDT by D-fendr (Deus non alligatur sacramentis sed nos alligamur.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson