Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: austingirl

How do you know whether or not I have a medical background? How do I know you do? Anyone can rattle off anything about Axis I, II, III, IV, or V, so what?

And where do you get off making libelous diagnoses of a man who you have never examined, never administered so much as one single test (which if you are a nurse and not a clinical psychologist you do not have the qualifications to do anyway) diagnoses based on nothing whatsoever about other than what the very dishonest media reports, and without any knowledge whatsoever of the positive traits this man may possess, or mitigating circumstances in this man’s life. Or for that matter, the kind of people this man’s ex-wives are. In fact, you don’t know anything. You just want to commit some learned-sounding libelous goobledy-gook for which you are probably paid, which you can get away with because this man is a public figure.

If you do possess some medical credential or other is it not an egregious abuse of it to use it in such a manner to make such terrible public statements about anyone’s psychiatric condition when you do NOT have all the facts? For that matter, you have no facts. You have hearsay.

If this were not a famous man you would be sued, and you would have to prove would you have said. And if indeed you did have some medical degree or other, you would lose it, and you deserve to lose it. You deserve to lose it for the things you said today. You ought to lose it.

I think if you really were a medical health professional, you would be a whole lot more careful about what you say in public about anyone, particularly where mental health issues are concerned.

I know if I were a medical health professional I would be very careful about patient confidentiality just on general principle, because I would be well schooled on those pesky HPIAA issues and how troublesome they are these days, and how one could even end up in prison if some Trump supporter in California read those libelous posts of yours, since I am not sure those libel laws that shield one from being sued by a public figure, would protect a mental health professional who undertook to diagnose an individual’s mental health, even a public figure’s, and then publish those diagnoses.

The draconian California HPIAA laws you see, are the kind of thing, if one did happen to be a medical professional in Nevada who is regularly involved with patients from California, would be aware of.

PS: FYI, narcissism is a common trait of alcoholics.


154 posted on 04/16/2016 2:36:38 PM PDT by erkelly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 148 | View Replies ]


To: erkelly

Oops, HIPAA.


155 posted on 04/16/2016 2:39:13 PM PDT by erkelly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 154 | View Replies ]

To: erkelly
because I would be well schooled on those pesky HPIAA issues

And a real health care professional would know that it is HIPAA, not HPIAA, training that we have to update on a yearly basis.

Sorry to nitpick. Overall, your posts are very good and you sound like a well-educated professional person.

175 posted on 04/17/2016 5:38:00 AM PDT by exDemMom (Current visual of the hole the US continues to dig itself into: http://www.usdebtclock.org/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 154 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson