[Innovative]

From the article:

“A 4-4 ruling would effectively scuttle the issue until after Obama leaves office in nine months, and mean at least a temporary setback to his domestic policy legacy — even if the justices punt, and choose to reargue the case when Scalia’s replacement is sworn in. The justices also could rule narrowly on procedure, finding a compromise on a technical issue not directly related to the larger policy questions.”

[midlander]

Obama stated in the beginning of his Presidency that He intended to remake America. Obama has striven daily to do just that.,

Not for the better. MOO. Pray for the strength of America to continue in what made our nation great. In Jesus name I pray. Amen.

[Liz]

From the article: “A 4-4 ruling would effectively scuttle the issue until after Obama leaves office, a temporary setback to his legacy — even if the justices punt, and reargue the case when Scalia’s replacement is sworn in. They could also rule narrowly on procedure, finding a compromise on a technical issue not directly related to the larger policy questions.”

REALITY CHECK: DHS had already issued three-year deferrals to more than 100,000 illegal aliens in violation of Judge Hannen's injunction. DOJ attorneys had assured him — both in court and in written pleadings — that no part of Obama's plan would be implemented until late February....

=======================================================

Obama's Executive Memo---signed on AF One---ordered a White House Task Force on New Americans to “engage with community, business, and faith leaders, as well as State and local elected officials.” The task force is designed to “help determine additional steps the Federal Government can take to ensure its programs and policies are serving diverse communities that include new Americans.”

SOURCE: “Creating Welcoming Communities Fully Integrating Immigrants and Refugees,” filed Nov. 26 2014 in the Federal Register at Vol. 79, No. 228, (http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2014-11-26/html/2014-28191.htm).

[i_robot73]

>“A 4-4 ruling would effectively scuttle the issue until after Obama leaves office in nine months, and mean at least a temporary setback to his domestic policy legacy — even if the justices punt, and choose to reargue the case when Scalia’s replacement is sworn in. The justices also could rule narrowly on procedure, finding a compromise on a technical issue not directly related to the larger policy questions.”

Oh, the Courts NEVER deal with specifics. Just look at O’Care. Re-written from the bench, ‘State exchanges’ don’t mean State exchanges...

And Congress continues to do...NOTHING.